Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 03/11/2006 View Fri 03/10/2006 View Thu 03/09/2006 View Wed 03/08/2006 View Tue 03/07/2006 View Mon 03/06/2006 View Sun 03/05/2006
1
2006-03-11 Down Under
Apathy on Hicks 'unbelievable'
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by tipper 2006-03-11 00:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 If I were Aussie I'd hope'd he been lost at 25,000 feet over the Indian Ocean - take John Lindh with him
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2006-03-11 00:34||   2006-03-11 00:34|| Front Page Top

#2 The Media were all over the Hicks story for weeks with very sympathetic coverage. Then they ran a couple of those TV polls and 90% of respondents thought Hicks should continue to rot in Gitmo and the media dropped the story like a hot potato, because it dawned them it was hurting ratings. The publicly funded broadcasters may have continued their coverage. I don't know because I don't watch them.
Posted by phil_b">phil_b  2006-03-11 01:00|| http://autonomousoperation.blogspot.com/]">[http://autonomousoperation.blogspot.com/]  2006-03-11 01:00|| Front Page Top

#3 So this lawyer says that any law that he disagrees with, isn't a law. That is a case for anarchy, if not evidence of the deranging power of zealotry.
Posted by Listen To Dogs 2006-03-11 02:37||   2006-03-11 02:37|| Front Page Top

#4 L-to-D: If the facts are on your side, argue the facts; if the law is on your side, argue the law; if neither the law nor the facts are on your side....
Posted by Rory B. Bellows 2006-03-11 02:44||   2006-03-11 02:44|| Front Page Top

#5 No polite way to put this, he is screwed.

I know the TRANZIs in the UK would love to make him their own. That is why the Court over there ruled he qualified for UK citizenship. They can't have him.
Posted by SPoD 2006-03-11 03:03|| http://sockpuppetofdoom.blogspot.com/]">[http://sockpuppetofdoom.blogspot.com/]  2006-03-11 03:03|| Front Page Top

#6 Rory, My law professor put it slightly differently.

L-to-D: If the facts are on your side, argue the facts; if the law is on your side, argue the law; if neither the law nor the facts are on your side....

If the facts are on your side, pound the facts; if the law is on your side, pound the law; if neither the law nor the facts are on your side pound the table. 8^)
Posted by AlanC">AlanC  2006-03-11 09:48||   2006-03-11 09:48|| Front Page Top

#7 We need Fredman to do the dialogue on Fawlty Towels Revisted and Uncensored.
Posted by 6 2006-03-11 10:30||   2006-03-11 10:30|| Front Page Top

#8 Who cares?

(You want apathy? I got apathy.)
Posted by Jackal">Jackal  2006-03-11 19:00|| http://home.earthlink.net/~sleepyjackal/index.html]">[http://home.earthlink.net/~sleepyjackal/index.html]  2006-03-11 19:00|| Front Page Top

23:55 Zhang Fei
23:55 2b
23:44 Zhang Fei
23:42 trailing wife
23:39 Jules
23:32 phil_b
23:28 trailing wife
23:21 doc
23:16 Zhang Fei
23:13 Bobby
23:12 Sherry
23:02 Anonymoose
22:59 Zhang Fei
22:56 Silentbrick
22:50 trailing wife
22:45 Pappy
22:42 Fred
22:39 BA
22:38 Pappy
22:31 Phil
22:30 Listen To Dogs
22:30 Zhang Fei
22:25 Zhang Fei
22:24 gromgoru









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com