Article

2007-11-09 Home Front: Politix

Lieberman Delivers Major Address on "The Politics of National Security"

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Nimble Spemble 2007-11-09 14:21|| || Front Page|| [9 views ] Top

#1 there is something profoundly wrongsomething that should trouble all of uswhen we have elected Democratic officials who seem more worried about how the Bush administration might respond to Irans murder of our troops, than about the fact that Iran is murdering our troops.

And that, dear Senator, is the irrationality of the liberal left. It's the same disease that afflicted the Trunks during the Clinton era. The Trunks lost focus on the mission (the country) to pursue Clinton.

Posted by anymouse">anymouse 2007-11-09 15:44|| 2007-11-09 15:44|| Front Page Top

#2 QFT

Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom 2007-11-09 16:44|| 2007-11-09 16:44|| Front Page Top

#3 "And if they did, their campaign would be as unsuccessful as mine was in 2006".

WTF? He's still a Senator isn't he? I'd call that somewhat successful. In fact, since he changed parties and still won in liberal toilet like Connecticut, I'd call that pretty goddamned good.

Posted by bigjim-ky 2007-11-09 16:58|| 2007-11-09 16:58|| Front Page Top

#4 Wonder what Ned Lamont's up to these days?

Posted by tu3031 2007-11-09 17:14|| 2007-11-09 17:14|| Front Page Top

#5 Senator Lieberman also indicated, there is something profoundly wrongsomething that should trouble all of uswhen we have elected Democratic officials who seem more worried about how the Bush administration might respond to Irans murder of our troops, than about the fact that Iran is murdering our troops.

"There is likewise something profoundly wrong when we see candidates who are willing to pander to this politically paranoid, hyper-partisan sentiment in the Democratic baseeven if it sends a message of weakness and division to the Iranian regime.

Would these be considered as "neocon" sentiments?

I hear that term thrown around by the hard Left as an all-purpose slur but if this is an example then count me as one also.

Posted by Grumenk Philalzabod0723 2007-11-09 20:01|| 2007-11-09 20:01|| Front Page Top

#6 lieberman has stones, and has it right 100% on this one. if more of the Demos wer like him the repubs would be in a lot more trouble than they are now...

Posted by Abu do you love 2007-11-09 20:03|| 2007-11-09 20:03|| Front Page Top

#7 Yosef again sprouting my own sentiments.

Posted by newc">newc 2007-11-09 22:37|| 2007-11-09 22:37|| Front Page Top

23:17 Unutle McGurque8861
23:15 SteveS
23:07 JosephMendiola
23:02 Zenster
23:01 JosephMendiola
22:49 Zenster
22:47 trailing wife
22:44 newc
22:41 newc
22:41 trailing wife
22:41 Zenster
22:40 newc
22:38 Six Gun Neo-Con
22:37 newc
22:28 rjschwarz
22:22 mom
22:15 Beavis
22:12 Pappy
22:10 Sock Puppet of Doom
22:05 Pappy
22:04 JosephMendiola
22:03 Frank G
22:03 Sock Puppet of Doom
22:01 Frank G