Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 02/06/2009 View Thu 02/05/2009 View Wed 02/04/2009 View Tue 02/03/2009 View Mon 02/02/2009 View Sun 02/01/2009 View Sat 01/31/2009
1
2009-02-06 International-UN-NGOs
UN Threat: No more parental rights
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by mom 2009-02-06 09:14|| || Front Page|| [4 views ]  Top

#1 Sorry, Mods--I forgot to correct the category.
Posted by mom">mom  2009-02-06 09:17|| idontknowbut.blogspot.com]">[idontknowbut.blogspot.com]  2009-02-06 09:17|| Front Page Top

#2 WND needs its own salt shaker.
Posted by Anonymoose 2009-02-06 09:41||   2009-02-06 09:41|| Front Page Top

#3 Sounds like Hillary's old childs-rights hoo-hah. Part of the reason why, though I voted for her in the primaries, I really, really didn't want to see her back in power. She used to push ideas that were more than a little insane.
Posted by Mitch H.">Mitch H.  2009-02-06 10:52|| http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/]">[http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/]  2009-02-06 10:52|| Front Page Top

#4 Commies gotta protect their base, the teachers' unions. Thus, no more home schooling. Too many dangerous democratic ideas taught by mothers. Gotta implant the socialist agenda at an early age.
Posted by Woozle Elmeter 2700 2009-02-06 13:52||   2009-02-06 13:52|| Front Page Top

#5 How does the Federal government have the jurisdiction to make a treaty on home schooling? That would be a State right and I don't see how the Feds could have standing to negoiate it away. Of course there are a lot of things the Feds do that I don't see them having jurisdiction over.
Posted by Glenmore">Glenmore  2009-02-06 16:32||   2009-02-06 16:32|| Front Page Top

#6 For that matter how can the Federal Government make laws (or treaties) covering so called 'privacy' or 'reproductive' rights? Where the hell is that given in the constitution? (not that anyone o the SCOTUS reads it anymore...)
Posted by CrazyFool 2009-02-06 17:38||   2009-02-06 17:38|| Front Page Top

23:52 JosephMendiola
23:48 JosephMendiola
23:48 Barbara Skolaut
23:43 OldSpook
23:42 JosephMendiola
23:42 OldSpook
23:39 OldSpook
23:36 SteveS
23:35 Midoman
23:31 JosephMendiola
23:30 Jeremiah Fleling8479
23:24 Frank G
23:21 Midoman
23:16 Pappy
23:04 Midoman
22:59 Gabby
22:56 Gabby
22:56 Gabby
22:53 Frank G
22:33 Midoman
22:25 Rambler in Virginia
22:23 Barbara Skolaut
22:21 Rambler in Virginia
22:06 Spike Uniter









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com