Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 07/20/2010 View Mon 07/19/2010 View Sun 07/18/2010 View Sat 07/17/2010 View Fri 07/16/2010 View Thu 07/15/2010 View Wed 07/14/2010
1
2010-07-20 -Lurid Crime Tales-
New Black Panther Leader: A Black Man Can't Be a Racist
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2010-07-20 00:00|| || Front Page|| [5 views ]  Top

#1 Versus

BHARAT RAKSHAK > KAGAN SCOTUS CONFIRMATION HERALDS DECLINE OF ANGLO-SAXON, WASP DOMINATION.

Six SCOTUS Judges will be Roman Catholic + Panel per se will become more highly diverse as to [Mixed]Race-Ethnicity + Gender.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2010-07-20 00:21||   2010-07-20 00:21|| Front Page Top

#2 This is part and parcel of the Newspeak definition of "racism" which can only refer to anti-black bigotry.

Also: anti-black or hispanic discrimination = bad
anti-white, indian, or oriental discrimination = good

Because, you know, South and East Asians value education and excel in business even though they are immigrant outsiders. There MUST be something unfair about that!

In Obamaland it's all about results now, not opportunity.
Posted by Scooter McGruder 2010-07-20 00:31||   2010-07-20 00:31|| Front Page Top

#3 If Malik Shabazz's slave master whips Shabazz, then by all means, he has right to take it from him and whip back. Was not aware there are slave masters, I thought slavery was abolished 150 years ago.

Reverse racism? No such a thing. Racism plain and simple.

Posted by twobyfour 2010-07-20 02:55||   2010-07-20 02:55|| Front Page Top

#4 OK, if it makes you feel better, I'll concede your definition for the Eubonics-speakers.

What do you call it when blacks judge all whites by the color of their skin? Anti-white retribution? It's gotta have a name.
Posted by Bobby 2010-07-20 05:55||   2010-07-20 05:55|| Front Page Top

#5 And by the way, Malik, my wife lost a job she'd been doing for two years to a person who had never done it before, but happened to have the preferred skin tone. Whaddaya call that?
Posted by Bobby 2010-07-20 05:57||   2010-07-20 05:57|| Front Page Top

#6 Social Justice 101 as taught on America's campuses
Posted by Frank G 2010-07-20 07:53||   2010-07-20 07:53|| Front Page Top

#7 1. Only white people can be racists.
2. All white people are racists.
Posted by Anguper Hupomosing9418 2010-07-20 09:57||   2010-07-20 09:57|| Front Page Top

#8 What do you call it when blacks judge all whites by the color of their skin?

Revealing
Racist
Hypocritical
Revenge
Posted by gorb 2010-07-20 10:32||   2010-07-20 10:32|| Front Page Top

#9 Shabazz is a hate-filled grievance-mongering racist shitbucket.
Posted by No I am The Other Beldar 2010-07-20 10:53||   2010-07-20 10:53|| Front Page Top

#10 Personally, I am prejudiced against all assholes, regardless of skin color.
Posted by Goober Goobelopolous 2010-07-20 10:57||   2010-07-20 10:57|| Front Page Top

#11 Look, the only way any rabble rouser in any culture at any point in history can be successful is to be perceived as infallable. Shabazz is no different, if not AAA league and unimaginative.
Posted by swksvolFF 2010-07-20 11:53||   2010-07-20 11:53|| Front Page Top

#12 Just sit back and let them do all the talking.
Posted by bigjim-CA 2010-07-20 14:56||   2010-07-20 14:56|| Front Page Top

#13 So shabazz, as long as black thugs outside of voting places don't use whips, but just batons, its all peachy keen?
------
There are two kinds of racism: positive and negative. Negative racism is when a person is put down and oppressed because of their skin color. That is the kind of racism Shabazz talks about. Positive racism is when a person is held up, defended, buttered up, praised, and rewarded because of their skin color. Shabazz, and all liberals, deny this is racism because it isn't negative.

However, when it comes to Government goodies, positive racism (the supposed good kind) implies and generates negative racism (the bad kind), because the handing out of Government goodies is a zero-sum game due to the goodies being limited. Thus, to give a dollar to help a black man inevitably denies a dollar to help anyone else.

If you don't believe Positive racism does not lead to negative racism, see how they react to white kids being told the achievements of the white race, in those terms, as black kids are told the achievements of the black race. You'll find them screaming their objections pretty quickly.

Posted by Ptah 2010-07-20 15:29||   2010-07-20 15:29|| Front Page Top

#14 > because the handing out of Government goodies is a zero-sum game

Oh no its not. It's vastly net negative as what's taxed to fund the entitled is EXTERMELY economically damaging.
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2010-07-20 18:34||   2010-07-20 18:34|| Front Page Top

#15 Spike lee was saying this sort of thing back, oh, right before his movies started tanking in the box office and he was forced back into doing commercials.
Posted by rjschwarz 2010-07-20 23:20||   2010-07-20 23:20|| Front Page Top

23:34 Skunky Glins****
23:21 Skunky Glins****
23:20 rjschwarz
22:58 Asymmetrical Triangulation
22:49  Anonymoose
22:45 Procopius2k
22:37 lord garth
22:30 Old Patriot
22:27 gorb
22:27 Mr. Bill
22:25 gorb
22:21 Old Patriot
22:15 gorb
22:13 gorb
22:06 Pappy
22:05 trailing wife
22:04 Mr. Bill
21:59 gorb
21:57 JosephMendiola
21:54 trailing wife
21:53 Fred
21:52 trailing wife
21:42 trailing wife
21:41 JosephMendiola









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com