Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 11/20/2010 View Fri 11/19/2010 View Thu 11/18/2010 View Wed 11/17/2010 View Tue 11/16/2010 View Mon 11/15/2010 View Sun 11/14/2010
1
2010-11-20 Home Front: Politix
What ethics trial for Barbara Waters?
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by gorb 2010-11-20 01:57|| || Front Page|| [1 views ]  Top

#1 Err, Maxine Waters?
Posted by SteveS 2010-11-20 07:13||   2010-11-20 07:13|| Front Page Top

#2 Can't it be both?
Posted by Raj 2010-11-20 09:31||   2010-11-20 09:31|| Front Page Top

#3 I read (@ AOSHQ) that there was "new information" which could mean additional charges
Posted by Frank G 2010-11-20 09:58||   2010-11-20 09:58|| Front Page Top

#4 "As a result, the adjudicatory subcommittee no longer has jurisdiction over this matter and the adjudicatory hearing previously scheduled for November 29, 2010 will not be held."

Sooo Maxine...who do you suppose now has "jurisdiction over this matter"? I wouldn't be so smug. They just might be talking about the DoJ.
Posted by DepotGuy 2010-11-20 10:48||   2010-11-20 10:48|| Front Page Top

#5 I dunno, DepotGuy. If Holder is leading the prosecution, I doubt the prosecution will lead anywhere useful, just like the Black Panthers investigation did.
Posted by Rambler in Virginia  2010-11-20 11:00||   2010-11-20 11:00|| Front Page Top

#6 combining Barbara Walters and Maxine Waters?

"If you could be a twee, what kind of twee would it be, cracker?"
Posted by Frank G 2010-11-20 11:11||   2010-11-20 11:11|| Front Page Top

#7 Comments, in the Hill, on the article are to the point. One wonders how big a clue bat the pols need? Does it take Madam Defarge and a mob?
Posted by Water Modem 2010-11-20 11:16||   2010-11-20 11:16|| Front Page Top

#8 My guess is that unlike Rangel, she showed her real snarl and teeth and scared the committee enough that Dem House Leadership decided to fold, send this back to the committe on some grounds, and let the Repub House leadership be seen as prosecuting her, with all the race-baiting charges she will throw.
If there are real criminal charges, and Holder's DOJ is involved, look for the very long stall......
Posted by NoMoreBS 2010-11-20 12:11||   2010-11-20 12:11|| Front Page Top

#9 Err, Maxine Waters?

Err, yes. I guess yesterday's "Good Morning" pic is still messing with me.
Posted by gorb 2010-11-20 12:18||   2010-11-20 12:18|| Front Page Top

#10 My guess is that unlike Rangel, she showed her real snarl and teeth and scared the committee

Chollie is your garden-variety, genial corrupt Northeastern politician, not all that far to the left and not many political allies. "Kerosene Maxine", on the other hand, is a full blown nasty socialist with plenty of political firepower and support from the media.

It'll be up to the 112th Congress, which convenes in January, and a new ethics committee.
Posted by Pappy 2010-11-20 13:57||   2010-11-20 13:57|| Front Page Top

23:59 borgboy
23:57 borgboy
23:42 European Conservative
23:31 Beavis
23:20 European Conservative
23:19 crosspatch
23:11 crosspatch
23:11 Barbara Skolaut
22:53 Pappy
22:51 Pappy
22:47 Perfesser
22:47 Pappy
22:41 pan
21:52 European Conservative
21:37 lotp
21:34 lotp
21:00 Private Eye
20:32 Sgt.Mom
20:26 Thing From Snowy Mountain
20:24 Secret Agent Man
20:15 Pappy
20:10 Besoeker
19:59 Besoeker
19:51 Procopius2k









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com