Article

2012-03-21 Britain

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by trailing wife 2012-03-21 00:00|| || Front Page|| [2 views ] Top

#1 Of course, for identification purposes the court could always take a finger if one didn't want to show one's face.

Posted by Skidmark 2012-03-21 12:21|| 2012-03-21 12:21|| Front Page Top

#2 How would you be able to tell if another person had taken her place?

Maybe an assassin with a whole different agenda, say simply to gain access ti the courtroom?

The judge was RIGHT.

Posted by Redneck Jim 2012-03-21 12:41|| 2012-03-21 12:41|| Front Page Top

#3 That the defense tolerated having a Muslim on the jury in the first place showed incompetence. A lawyer could exclude one with just a few questions.

1) Do you accept that Crown law is the supreme law of Britain and all of its subjects?

2) Do you believe that atheists, Christians, Jews and homosexuals should be treated before the law as equal to Muslims?

3) Do you believe that women are equal to men and that women in legal authority may sit in judgment over men?

Posted by Anonymoose 2012-03-21 19:46|| 2012-03-21 19:46|| Front Page Top

23:09 DK70 the scantily clad
22:59 JosephMendiola
22:47 JosephMendiola
22:14 American Delight
22:11 Frank G
22:00 Shamp Clong8416
21:28 JosephMendiola
21:25 Shamp Clong8416
21:23 JosephMendiola
21:22 gorb
21:16 Mike Kozlowski
21:16 gorb
21:14 Shamp Clong8416
21:08 JosephMendiola
20:24 Procopius2k
20:09 JosephMendiola
19:54 JosephMendiola
19:46 Anonymoose
19:42 JosephMendiola
19:15 remoteman
18:57 Shieldwolf
18:44 Spike Smiter of the Hemps4112
18:40 Skidmark
18:40 Scooter McGruder