Article

2012-03-28 India-Pakistan

DPC says no to resumption of Nato supplies

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2012-03-28 00:00|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [154 views ] Top
File under: Govt of Pakistan

#1 See also NEWS KERALA > US APOLOGY OVER NATO AIR STRIKES IN PAKISTAN "NOT GOOD ENOUGH", SAYS RABBANI KHAR.

IIUC, IOW Pakland wants to feel the love, vee lotsa $$$ + other new Econ Goodies.

and

* DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > PAKISTAN OPPOSITION BLOCKS NATO [supply] ROUTES.

* SAME > ISLAMABAD SUPPORTS/BACKS [peaceful = NucEnergy]]IRANIAN NUCLEAR ACTIVITIES: PAKISTAN SENATE CHIEF.

D *** NG IT, and just because Iran repor supports the local insurgency agz Islamabad = Pakistan is no reason for Pakistan to think otherwise!

Espec given ...

* WAFF > IRAN AND THE AZERI PROBLEM.

'Tis "Bigger than just Baluchistan", ala IRPAK/PAKRAN.

Yuuup, yessirree, you betcha.

Posted by JosephMendiola 2012-03-28 23:40|| 2012-03-28 23:40|| Front Page Top

00:00 JosephMendiola
23:54 Water Modem
23:53 canalzone
23:47 canalzone
23:40 JosephMendiola
23:34 canalzone
23:13 Winky Wittlesbach4082
23:08 swksvolFF
23:08 JosephMendiola
22:57 canalzone
22:42 USN, Ret.
22:32 USN, Ret.
22:28 trailing wife
22:22 USN, Ret.
21:49 Northern Cousin
21:44 Northern Cousin
21:29 Northern Cousin
21:21 Northern Cousin
21:09 Shimble Guelph5793
21:04 Shimble Guelph5793
20:31 Fred
20:23 Shimble Guelph5793
20:12 DepotGuy
20:06 DepotGuy

Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.

50.17.109.248