Posted by GolfBravoUSMC 2013-02-14 03:55||
2013-02-14 03:55||
Front PageTop
#4 Knock off the "Intelligent Design" Crap.
Use something else.
Posted by Redneck Jim 2013-02-14 08:09||
2013-02-14 08:09||
Front PageTop
#5 keep it up, GBUSMC. You add to the page, unlike some
Posted by Frank G 2013-02-14 08:11||
2013-02-14 08:11||
Front PageTop
#6 I don't object to the pictures, I object to everything being called "Intelligent Design"
GOT IT.
Posted by Redneck Jim 2013-02-14 08:14||
2013-02-14 08:14||
Front PageTop
#7 In other news of Intelligent Design on this day Gallup says, "With President Barack Obama's first term characterized by strained relations between Pakistan and the U.S., more than nine in 10 Pakistanis (92%) disapprove of U.S. leadership and 4% approve, the lowest approval rating Pakistanis have ever given." But everyone was supposed to love us after George W. left office and the smartest man in the world and beyond became supreme leader.
Posted by JohnQC 2013-02-14 10:24||
2013-02-14 10:24||
Front PageTop
#8 Diego-san, an Intelligent (albeit creepy) Design
Posted by Pappy 2013-02-14 10:38||
2013-02-14 10:38||
Front PageTop
#9 I rather think of Evangelista as simply a.... "helpmate".
Posted by Besoeker 2013-02-14 10:47||
2013-02-14 10:47||
Front PageTop
#10 I think the designs are more intelligent than Dr. Evil's fembots...
Posted by Glenmore 2013-02-14 11:13||
2013-02-14 11:13||
Front PageTop
#11 A great set of legs and a wonderful butt on a woman have to be intelligent design.
You want bird legs and flat butts on your women?
Posted by Bill Clinton 2013-02-14 11:35||
2013-02-14 11:35||
Front PageTop
#12 Heart Evangelista is light years ahead of Diego-san.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2013-02-14 11:54||
2013-02-14 11:54||
Front PageTop
#13 From a physically relevant Intelligent-Design perspective, yes. But the robot is from an "emotionally relevant" design perspective. That would be helful in dealing with certain people like SecState officials, people of the leftward-political persuasion (perhaps an overlap with the former tho) and some Rantburg commenters.
Posted by Pappy 2013-02-14 14:50||
2013-02-14 14:50||
Front PageTop
#14 GolfBravoUSMC, I can honestly say I subscribe to PLAYBOY Rantburg for the articles and not the pictures.
Then again who is fooling whom ?
GolfBravoUSMC carry on keep up the good work.
Posted by Pinocchio Knows 2013-02-14 15:49||
2013-02-14 15:49||
Front PageTop
#15 When else would you post someone as 'Well and Intelligently designed' as Heart except on Valentine's day?
Posted by CrazyFool 2013-02-14 16:21||
2013-02-14 16:21||
Front PageTop
#16 Hmm, noone's made any jokes about evangelization yet?
Posted by Thing From Snowy Mountain 2013-02-14 17:54||
2013-02-14 17:54||
Front PageTop
#17 Because we don't want to blow the 'fuses' of certain commenters...
Posted by Pappy 2013-02-14 23:01||
2013-02-14 23:01||
Front PageTop
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
