Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 02/16/2013 View Fri 02/15/2013 View Thu 02/14/2013 View Wed 02/13/2013 View Tue 02/12/2013 View Mon 02/11/2013 View Sun 02/10/2013
1
2013-02-16 Terror Networks
Headley listed among 5 high-value targets
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by tipper 2013-02-16 01:31|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [312 views ]  Top

#1 The designation of HVT's, detention [POW's], and targeting should be the business of the military commander engaged in combat operations on the ground, not the White House or the Central Intelligence Agency.

Unity of effort is destroyed and success is impaired when you have politically disparate elements running around the battlespace, conducting their own private wars, failing to share information and intelligence.



Posted by Besoeker 2013-02-16 03:36||   2013-02-16 03:36|| Front Page Top

#2 What we have right now is a mess.

But I'm not sure I agree with you Besoeker. There's a good argument to be made that it was precisely a military response to non-state actors that has tied us in knots. A much more aggressive paramilitary response in Afghan, Iraq, Yemen etc. while maintaining public silence on what would trigger larger scale intervention might well have gone a long way to creating more helpful attitudes around the world. Muslim authorities insist that jihadi terrorism isn't their policy? Fine. Then a lot of people will end up having unfortunate and sometimes quite dramatic accidents while State takes heavily sweetened tea with their counterparts.

In addition, mixing military and intel issues so pervasively is exactly what has brought us to the point of having to ask whether this president thinks he can drone zap US citizens on US soil.
Posted by lotp 2013-02-16 10:27||   2013-02-16 10:27|| Front Page Top

#3 "having to ask whether this president thinks he can drone zap US citizens on US soil"

No need to ask.

He does. >:-(
Posted by Barbara 2013-02-16 10:46||   2013-02-16 10:46|| Front Page Top

#4 An over-simplification, but if you don't own [control] the terrain and fail to control the border and eliminate border insurgent sanctuaries you lose, simple as that. Thousands of madrassas and mosques in Quetta and Chaman are incubators and armories for the Afghan insurgency. It is my view that all terrorism or counterinsurgencies are "state sponsored". The challenge is what "state" is doing the sponsoring.

If you stick your finger in a stock tack you'll be able to see the ripples. If you pull your finger out and come back 5 minutes later, no ripples are visible. It will be as though you were never there. Trying to introduce these people [tribal Afghans or Paks] to western democracy is a fool's errand. It has been from the start.
Posted by Besoeker 2013-02-16 11:15||   2013-02-16 11:15|| Front Page Top

#5 Death by drone is simply an expansion of CIA market share. They've been at war with DoD (less special mission units) for decades and are now winning. The appointment of John Brennan as the Director CIA should be given very, very close scrutiny. I fear this man and the trouble he may bring us.
Posted by Besoeker 2013-02-16 11:27||   2013-02-16 11:27|| Front Page Top

#6 John Brennan will lead us back to the "good old days" of Allen Dulles and the crazy crap nonsense that was the CIA with secret wars over half the globe.

When my career as a military guy ended, I asked my OPO officer why and he said, well officially its a RIF, unofficially the Army hierarchy is purging the officer ranks of anyone who was doing the CIA dirty work. Too many rogue operations and too many officers with compromised senses of moral/ethical duties and responsiblities vis a vis the Geneva Convention.

So we'll have another generation of military officers flung into crazy situations doing heroic things and getting the shaft when a new DCI and CJCOS take over.
Posted by Bill Clinton 2013-02-16 12:35||   2013-02-16 12:35|| Front Page Top

#7 Based on US policy of targeting anyone in terrorist areas US citizens included. If Isreal had a similar policy I conclude they could target anyone visiting Palestine.
Posted by airandee 2013-02-16 14:48||   2013-02-16 14:48|| Front Page Top

#8 I thought they meant Headley Lamarr...
Posted by mojo 2013-02-16 16:39||   2013-02-16 16:39|| Front Page Top

#9 OTOH DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS [old] > [India Times = Econ Times of India] SENTENCE PROVES DAVID HEADLEY WAS A DOUBLE-AGENT FOR THE US [+ LeT].

Sniff, sniff - Penn State + "Professor" Muhammed Atta???
Posted by JosephMendiola 2013-02-16 21:03||   2013-02-16 21:03|| Front Page Top

22:57 whatadeal
22:52 whatadeal
22:22 lotp
21:03 JosephMendiola
20:58 JosephMendiola
20:49 Pappy
20:27 Besoeker
20:24 Besoeker
20:22 Thing From Snowy Mountain
20:21 Besoeker
20:18 phil_b
20:18 Thing From Snowy Mountain
20:06 Barbara
20:02 Barbara
19:55 Bright Pebbles
19:52 Alanc
19:46 Procopius2k
19:42 Nimble Spemble
19:36 trailing wife
19:28 trailing wife
19:24 CrazyFool
19:22 Frank G
19:13 lord garth
19:05 JohnQC

Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
54.196.159.11


Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com