Article

2015-02-26 Government

President Obama confirms that illegal immigrants who qualify for his programs won't be deported regardless of judge's order

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2015-02-26 12:34|| || Front Page|| [1 views ] Top

#1 He doesn't give a shit about even pretending to follow the law anymore. The tyrant is out in the open.

Posted by DarthVader 2015-02-26 12:36|| 2015-02-26 12:36|| Front Page Top

#2 He's a tyrant (well, a puppet tyrant), but an elected one. He does have that in common with Hitler. Often people wish to be subjects.

Posted by Glenmore 2015-02-26 13:08|| 2015-02-26 13:08|| Front Page Top

#3 rancorous applause

That word does not mean what you think it does.

Posted by KBK 2015-02-26 13:46|| 2015-02-26 13:46|| Front Page Top

#4 Getting better all the time: Obama Dares GOP: Go Ahead, ‘Have a Vote on Whether What I’m Doing Is Legal…I Will Veto’

I fear that he will plunk some whack-o's magic twanger and things will get really ugly.

Posted by Spereling Hupeling6103 2015-02-26 16:11|| 2015-02-26 16:11|| Front Page Top

#5 Contempt is a disregard or disobedience of public authority. As
applied to injunctions, criminal contempt is wilful disobedience of the
courts' decree, thus resulting in a disregard for the courts' authority.
Criminal contempt in the federal courts has to some extent been limited.
both substantively and procedurally, by statute; but for the most part,
the common law rules still prevail.' Formulation of general rules determining
the evidentiary requirements for criminal contempt is difficult
because the violation is defined largely by the terms of the specific injunction.
For example, a guard accused of mishandling a federal prisoner
in a county jail could not be convicted of criminal contempt because this
conduct was not embodied in a decree.8 But where there was a court
order committing a prisoner into the custody of a sheriff to be held safe
until the expiration of his sentence, his conduct in allowing a prisoner to
go free was criminal contempt.' Thus it is seen that an injunction is
analogous to a criminal statute. Conduct not forbidden cannot be criminal
contempt. But, like statutes, injunctions frequently must be phrased
in general terms to be effective and therefore require subsequent judicial
interpretation to ascertain what they prohibit."

http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2810&context=ilj

Posted by Ebbomosh Hupemp2664 2015-02-26 16:41|| 2015-02-26 16:41|| Front Page Top

#6 And the RINOs are perfectly fine with this tyrant.

Posted by Airandee 2015-02-26 22:18|| 2015-02-26 22:18|| Front Page Top

#7 AFAIK the US Constitution does NOT recognize Partial, Semi-, or Quasi-US Citizens + Permanent Residents - ITS EITHER THEY ARE, OR THEY ARE NOT.

EITHER DEPORT THEM ASAP, EN MASSE' IFF NEED BE, OR ELSE STOP P ******** WUSSYING AROUND + MAKE THEM DE FACTO CITIZENS-RESIDENTS.

WHY? BECAUSE THE FEDS ARE BREAKING CONSTITUTIONAL + FEDERAL LAWS IFF THEY DON'T, WHICH THEY ARE NOT TO BE DOING.

Many Years or Decades of Pervasive or Perennial PCorrectness-Deniabilty has affected the Fed so much I won't be surprised iff they don't know the difference between right or wrong, up versus down, etc. anymore.

Posted by JosephMendiola 2015-02-26 22:21|| 2015-02-26 22:21|| Front Page Top

23:53 JosephMendiola
23:41 JosephMendiola
23:37 Thomoting Schwarzeneggar6888
23:24 JosephMendiola
23:11 JosephMendiola
23:05 JosephMendiola
22:33 Rob Crawford
22:31 Rob Crawford
22:30 Retired Spook
22:23 Airandee
22:21 JosephMendiola
22:18 Airandee
22:09 JosephMendiola
22:04 JosephMendiola
21:45 Procopius2k
21:37 OldSpook
21:28 swksvolFF
21:05 trailing wife
20:53 Alaska Paul
20:19 KBK
19:11 Zhang Fei
18:46 USN, Ret
18:35 Mike Kozlowski
18:27 swksvolFF