Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 09/01/2015 View Mon 08/31/2015 View Sun 08/30/2015 View Sat 08/29/2015 View Fri 08/28/2015 View Thu 08/27/2015 View Wed 08/26/2015
1
2015-09-01 Science & Technology
Is This the Warship of the Future?
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Blossom Unains5562 2015-09-01 00:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views ]  Top

#1 And sharks with frikin lasers attached to their heads.
Posted by BrerRabbit 2015-09-01 01:20||   2015-09-01 01:20|| Front Page Top

#2 Don't forget a long spike on the bow, so that they can ram enemy ships. (sarcasm)
Posted by ed in texas 2015-09-01 07:54||   2015-09-01 07:54|| Front Page Top

#3 THe fundamental problem of the battleship is that it was totally outranged by the aircraft carrier and that even the mighty Yamato could be sunk by a carrier at the cost of a few aircraft. That meant an exchange rate of two or three thousand men against twenty or thirty and a gazillion dollars (in 2015 terms) a against a, by comparison tiny amount of money and resources.

For the article it looks more like a paper written by sfi-addict teenager than by qualifiued personel. Just think in the "ultra-strong composites" (I don't doubt by 2050 there will also be ultra-string explosives) and the 3D printers making drones (with all their electronics requiring silicon pure to about one atom of something else in a _billion_ atoms of silicon. Also apparently those "experts" didn't even think in equipping it with Gauss guns in order to fill the range gap with aircraft carriers. For the drones, if your primary weapon is a fleet of drones then you are not a battleship but an aircraft carrier that happens to be operating unmanned vehicles.
Posted by JFM 2015-09-01 07:57||   2015-09-01 07:57|| Front Page Top

#4 I am not sure paper written by a a sci-fi addict teenage accurataly depicts this text. Drunk, high on crack sci-fi addict teenager would becloser to the target.
Posted by JFM 2015-09-01 08:01||   2015-09-01 08:01|| Front Page Top

#5 The object is to deliver ordnance on target at a specific point or target. The fiddlely part is how much ordnance, cause delivering a 1 kiloton device would usually take out most targets.
Posted by Procopius2k 2015-09-01 09:33||   2015-09-01 09:33|| Front Page Top

#6 How about a battleship with Gauss guns?
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2015-09-01 09:37||   2015-09-01 09:37|| Front Page Top

#7 Just hope that the spec sheet excludes Lucas as the electronics supplier (unless they really want to go to The Dark Side)
Posted by USN, Ret. 2015-09-01 14:45||   2015-09-01 14:45|| Front Page Top

#8 I think the future is subs that can deploy drones and or ships that can deploy a dozen disposable PT-type boats. Consider the ships expendable and you can cut the crew down to nothing.
Posted by rjschwarz 2015-09-01 14:58||   2015-09-01 14:58|| Front Page Top

#9 He forgot the Phasers and Photon Torpedoes.

And of course the Wave Motion Gun in the bow.

What's a swimming drone? Wouldn't that be a marine drone or unmanned boat?
Posted by CrazyFool 2015-09-01 17:49||   2015-09-01 17:49|| Front Page Top

#10 Need to get going mining the unobtanium for the hull
Posted by OldSpook 2015-09-01 22:08||   2015-09-01 22:08|| Front Page Top

23:53 JosephMendiola
23:38 trailing wife
23:36 JosephMendiola
23:34 JosephMendiola
23:26 JosephMendiola
23:16 JosephMendiola
23:11 newc
23:10 rammer
23:09 newc
23:05 newc
23:00 JosephMendiola
22:45 JosephMendiola
22:08 OldSpook
22:04 M. Murcek
21:51 OldSpook
21:50 Frank G
21:00 Procopius2k
20:40 Thing From Snowy Mountain
20:21 Ebbart Glererong5900
20:15 junkiron
19:54 AlanC
19:49 RandomJD
19:23 BrerRabbit
18:57 lord garth









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com