Article

2016-01-07 -Lurid Crime Tales-

Bill Clinton Privately Mocked Paula Jones as an Attention-Seeking 'Floozy'

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2016-01-07 00:00|| || Front Page|| [3 views ] Top

#1 What is little mentioned is that the Washington Post interviewed Paula Jones in October before the first Clinton election and editors at the WaPo sat on the story until after Paula had her first press conference.

The WaPo could have put an end to the Clinton campaign and deliberately quashed important information.

Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom 2016-01-07 00:17|| 2016-01-07 00:17|| Front Page Top

#2 Welcome to the wonderful world of objective journalism SPOD.

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-01-07 02:31|| 2016-01-07 02:31|| Front Page Top

#3 Charles Krauthammer - ON THE CLINTON'S

The Clinton Foundation is "organized crime" at its finest, and we are financing it! Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as a tax free international money laundering scheme. It may eventually prove to be the largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. history. This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you
and re-package it, to be used for your own purposes. All tax free.

Here's how it works:

1. You create a separate foreign "charity." In this case one in Canada.

2. Foreign oligarch's & governments, then donate to this Canadian charity.
In this case, over 1,000 did, contributing mega millions. I am sure they did this out of the goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in
return. (Imagine Putin's buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to
send un-told millions to a Canadian charity).

3. The Canadian charity then bundles these separate donations & makes a
massive donation to the Clinton Foundation.

4. The Clinton Foundation, and the cooperating Canadian charity claim
Canadian law prohibits the identification of individual donors.

5. The Clinton Foundation, then "spends" some of this money, for legitimate
good works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of
10%. Much of the balance goes to enrich the Clinton's, pay salaries to
un-told numbers of hangers on, & fund lavish travel, etc. Again virtually
all tax free, which means you & I are subsidizing it.

6. The Clinton Foundation with access to the world's best accountants,
somehow fails to report much of this on their tax filings. They discover
these "clerical errors" and begin the process of re-filing 5 years of tax
returns.

7. Net result: foreign money, much of it from other countries, goes into the
Clinton's pockets tax free & untraceable back to the original donor. This
is the textbook definition of money laundering.

Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity" includes, as a principal one Frank
Giustra. Google him. He is the guy who was central to the formation of
Uranium One, a Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium
interests & then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia. This
transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and, guess who was
Secretary of State, when the approval, was granted? As an aside, imagine
how former, Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell feels. That poor schlep is in jail because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing
minor favors, for a guy promoting, a vitamin company. Not legal, but not
exactly putting U.S. security at risk.

Sarcasm aside, if you are still not persuaded, this was a cleverly
structured way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clinton's, ask
yourself this: Why did these foreign interests funnel money through a
Canadian charity? Why not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation?
Better yet, why not donate money directly to the people, organizations &
countries in need?

This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling. Now you
know why Hillary's destruction of 30,000 e-mails was a risk, she was willing
to take. Bill and Hillary are devious, unprincipled, dishonest, and
criminal, and they are Slick!

Warning: They could be back in the White House in January 2017. Do not let
it happen. Remember, most people are not well informed. We must somehow
inform and educate them.

Charles Krauthammer

Warm Wishes and May God Bless America.

p.s. God help America!

Posted by Besoeker 2016-01-07 02:32|| 2016-01-07 02:32|| Front Page Top

#4 Remember, most people are not well informed. We must somehow inform and educate them

Should I cry, or should I roll on the floor laughing?

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-01-07 02:42|| 2016-01-07 02:42|| Front Page Top

#5 'Crying or laughing' at the comments of a psychiatrist ?

Posted by Besoeker 2016-01-07 03:58|| 2016-01-07 03:58|| Front Page Top

#6 Don't pretend to be an idiot, besoeker.

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-01-07 04:17|| 2016-01-07 04:17|| Front Page Top

#7 Back the headline- it takes one to know one, Willie.

Posted by Bobby 2016-01-07 07:51|| 2016-01-07 07:51|| Front Page Top

#8 Does anyone have a link on that Charles Krauthammer piece?

Posted by Crusader 2016-01-07 10:33|| 2016-01-07 10:33|| Front Page Top

#9 Copy, not source

Posted by Skidmark 2016-01-07 17:54|| 2016-01-07 17:54|| Front Page Top

23:54 Sock Puppet of Doom
23:24 European Conservative
22:59 Rambler in Virginia
22:48 European Conservative
22:45 Mullah Richard
21:14 trailing wife
21:03 trailing wife
20:57 Frank G
20:52 trailing wife
20:24 Alaska Paul
20:22 Alaska Paul
19:45 Rex Mundi
19:42 Alaska Paul
19:41 Frank G
19:14 Unelet Protector of the Sith2424
19:00 Alaska Paul
18:36 Anguper Hupomosing9418
18:20 Glearong Lumumba8690
18:15 Elmerert Hupens2660
17:54 Skidmark
17:43 Skidmark
17:41 Skidmark
17:39 Skidmark
17:36 Rex Mundi