Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 02/17/2016 View Tue 02/16/2016 View Mon 02/15/2016 View Sun 02/14/2016 View Sat 02/13/2016 View Fri 02/12/2016 View Thu 02/11/2016
1
2016-02-17 Home Front: WoT
Judge orders Apple to help unlock iPhone used by Kalifornia Killers
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Anguper Hupomosing9418 2016-02-17 01:13|| || Front Page|| [2 views ]  Top

#1 Apple doesn't have a back door

ask the Chinese manufacturers or Intel service. I bet they do
Posted by Frank G 2016-02-17 08:49||   2016-02-17 08:49|| Front Page Top

#2 Dear Judge - "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction." - 13th Amendment.

If the process doesn't exist, then you are doing said act. However, such tyranny from the bench is becoming all too common. Long past the time of term limits for such members of the ruling caste.
Posted by Procopius2k 2016-02-17 09:38||   2016-02-17 09:38|| Front Page Top

#3 Apple has publicly stated they can't do it. Now they have to say it under oath.
Posted by Iblis 2016-02-17 10:54||   2016-02-17 10:54|| Front Page Top

#4 There isn't an Apple building within a mile of Ft. Meade?
Posted by Sven the pelter 2016-02-17 11:03||   2016-02-17 11:03|| Front Page Top

#5 They can advertise as the dIrkaphone.
Posted by Thing From Snowy Mountain 2016-02-17 11:20||   2016-02-17 11:20|| Front Page Top

#6 Because it's not secure, like they promised, then drug lords, terrorists, and other criminals will find some non-Apple communications gear. Apple sales will fall, like the Newton.
Posted by Bobby 2016-02-17 12:34||   2016-02-17 12:34|| Front Page Top

#7 Brute force attack should succeed, the only question is the real world cost to implement it. Now is the Judge demanding this service for free? Rhetorical question... ;-)
Posted by magpie  2016-02-17 13:10||   2016-02-17 13:10|| Front Page Top

#8 Spent 30+ years in the biz and I know that their are some things that are just not reversible in the normal universe.

No matter how many times you crank it in reverse the meat grinder ain't turning the sausage back into a pig.
Posted by AlanC 2016-02-17 17:07||   2016-02-17 17:07|| Front Page Top

#9 ^ their = there 8^(
Posted by AlanC 2016-02-17 17:08||   2016-02-17 17:08|| Front Page Top

#10 No, A Judge Did Not Just Order Apple To Break Encryption On San Bernardino Shooter's iPhone, But To Create A New Backdoor

I doubt it will happen.
Posted by newc 2016-02-17 17:16||   2016-02-17 17:16|| Front Page Top

#11 If Apple DID buckle and create a backdoor, I do not trust any government agency to not mishandle and abuse that capability. None.

Anything is possible, even a purportedly impossible to create backdoor. How likely is an entirely different question. So is how costly.

The judge should not be a sitting judge.
Posted by Whiskey Mike 2016-02-17 20:56||   2016-02-17 20:56|| Front Page Top

23:05 gorb
22:58 Rambler in Virginia
22:56 JosephMendiola
22:50 JosephMendiola
22:43 JosephMendiola
22:34 JosephMendiola
22:27 JosephMendiola
22:24 JosephMendiola
22:22 JosephMendiola
21:26 Barbara
21:24 Barbara
21:18 Barbara
20:56 Whiskey Mike
20:28 CrazyFool
19:56 JosephMendiola
19:49 james
19:46 phil_b
19:45 USN, Ret.
19:07 Barbara
19:07 ed in texas
19:05 Procopius2k
19:05 Barbara
18:46 swksvolFF
18:41 swksvolFF









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com