Article

2016-02-28 Caribbean-Latin America

2nd former Mexican president unloads on Donald Trump

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Besoeker 2016-02-28 00:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views ] Top

#1 I think mexico has bigger problems on hand than the trumpster.

Now if trump starts making noises about "Picking up where we left off in 1848" and "Bringing El Norte to you" then the mexicans have grounds for complaint.

Posted by Nguard 2016-02-28 00:50|| 2016-02-28 00:50|| Front Page Top

#2 "They do not, they do not, they do not represent the view of the vast majority of the American people."

Whatever you say, Joe!

Posted by Raj 2016-02-28 02:11|| 2016-02-28 02:11|| Front Page Top

#3 #1 - might as well get the resources if we're going to get stuck with the population. And you can shrink the length of the border the further south you go. The wall just got smaller.

Posted by Procopius2k 2016-02-28 08:14|| 2016-02-28 08:14|| Front Page Top

#4 In essence, Trump is talking about defunding Mexico. The benefactors of the status quo could be expected to complain.

Posted by Iblis 2016-02-28 14:21|| 2016-02-28 14:21|| Front Page Top

#5 China and Mexico both apprehensive of a Trump Presidency? Is there a downside?

Posted by Blossom Unains5562 2016-02-28 16:53|| 2016-02-28 16:53|| Front Page Top

#6 Is there a downside?

If you like ObamaCare, crony capitalism, abortion and wishy washy supreme court justices, no. No downside at all.

Posted by Iblis 2016-02-28 18:53|| 2016-02-28 18:53|| Front Page Top

#7 ...we already have that with a wishy washy Trunk controlled Congress which by the way is suppose to control the purse strings and in doing so corral most of that. However, they seemed happy passing the Pelosi-Reid sponsored omnibus funding that covered all that for another year plus of operation. Then they make a theater of proposed restrictions which are of course subject to executive veto. They know that. They're just trying to make it look good.

Posted by Procopius2k 2016-02-28 23:24|| 2016-02-28 23:24|| Front Page Top

23:26 Procopius2k
23:24 Procopius2k
23:24 junkiron
23:19 Procopius2k
22:35 Skidmark
22:33 Skidmark
22:13 Blossom Unains5562
21:18 Alaska Paul
21:14 Alaska Paul
21:08 JosephMendiola
21:07 JosephMendiola
20:56 Dale
20:48 JosephMendiola
20:47 Skidmark
20:40 JosephMendiola
20:27 jvalentour
20:24 jvalentour
20:20 jvalentour
20:02 JHH
19:56 lord garth
19:27 DarthVader
19:21 Fat Bob Jitle4620
19:07 SteveS
18:58 Iblis