Article

2016-03-05 Down Under

Islamist political party Hizb ut-Tahrir found guilty of sexist discrimination

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Apples 2016-03-05 00:00|| || Front Page|| [9 views ] Top
File under: Hizb-ut-Tahrir

#1 How the feck can this be described as a "landmark decision" - it's Australia - are they that far gone?

Posted by Bov Flimbers 2016-03-05 00:19|| 2016-03-05 00:19|| Front Page Top

#2 I like it!
The AU govt will listen, consider and fairly rule.

Posted by Skidmark 2016-03-05 03:19|| 2016-03-05 03:19|| Front Page Top

#3 And the sun rose in the east.

[/sarc]

Posted by AlanC 2016-03-05 07:44|| 2016-03-05 07:44|| Front Page Top

#4 thanks Fred, Rantburg - i tried to post a couple of times but it wasnt working for some reason

it is landmark because it has not been tested before. Where do the religious have to draw the line and conform to secular law?

In the end that question, though a consideration, was not a deciding factor as HT are an unregistered political party and the meeting was a public meeting open to all, not a religious ceremony

It is also landmark as it established liability for Ismail al-Wahwah of HT Australia

They have evaded legal liability for anything because they are not registered as any type of organisation so their members can just claim they didn't know and are not responsible for the illegal activities of the group.

If anyone is interested they can read the judgement here

https://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/decision/56d79c34e4b0e71e17f4fd06

Posted by Apples 2016-03-05 21:01|| 2016-03-05 21:01|| Front Page Top

#5 That link is to a video only

This link is to a proper online web story so you dont have to watch a video, it is text and pictures

https://au.news.yahoo.com/nsw/a/31017155/islamist-fundamentalist-group-hizb-ut-tahrir-found-guilty-of-gender-discrimination/

Posted by Apples 2016-03-05 21:03|| 2016-03-05 21:03|| Front Page Top

#6 You did well, Apples, and beat Anon1 to post that story yesterday. That takes some doing -- Anon1 is not dilatory about such things. :-) Glad to have you aboard!

Posted by trailing wife 2016-03-05 22:17|| 2016-03-05 22:17|| Front Page Top

23:52 Bov Flimbers
23:50 Bov Flimbers
23:24 Besoeker
23:17 Procopius2k
22:17 trailing wife
21:59 swksvolFF
21:57 swksvolFF
21:50 CrazyFool
21:34 Chuck
21:14 Pappy
21:10 airandee
21:05 Anon1
21:03 Apples
21:01 Apples
20:48 Crusock de Medici5565
20:22 Procopius2k
19:30 junkiron
18:50 Iblis
18:27 Procopius2k
17:59 Alistaire Glaviger8095
17:57 Angeper Borgia5797
17:56 Iblis
17:52 Skidmark
17:50 Clusong Grineck4147