Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 03/08/2016 View Mon 03/07/2016 View Sun 03/06/2016 View Sat 03/05/2016 View Fri 03/04/2016 View Thu 03/03/2016 View Wed 03/02/2016
1
2016-03-08 China-Japan-Koreas
Ships prepare to return 331-kg plutonium stash from Japan to U.S.
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2016-03-08 00:00|| || Front Page|| [7 views ]  Top

#1 Go Green! Recycle this plutonium. Make new warheads.
Posted by Blossom Phath9915 2016-03-08 00:18||   2016-03-08 00:18|| Front Page Top

#2 Calling all terrorists, Calling all terrorists

Here I am!!!
Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom 2016-03-08 00:26||   2016-03-08 00:26|| Front Page Top

#3 Please tell me this shipment has some kind of armed escort.
Posted by gorb 2016-03-08 01:10||   2016-03-08 01:10|| Front Page Top

#4 No, that might offend someone.
Posted by Steven 2016-03-08 01:39||   2016-03-08 01:39|| Front Page Top

#5 Once it arrives in the U.S., the plutonium will be disposed of
How does one dispose of plutonium? Bury it under some Nevada mountain? The Yucca Mountain site wasn't deemed safe enough for even low-level waste.
Posted by Bobby 2016-03-08 07:54||   2016-03-08 07:54|| Front Page Top

#6 At one time they had enough to make 50k nuke bombs. 331 kg is just a drop in the bucket.
Posted by 3dc 2016-03-08 09:10||   2016-03-08 09:10|| Front Page Top

#7 If you stack it up nice and compact you could get it all on one ship, heh.
Posted by Alaska Paul 2016-03-08 10:32||   2016-03-08 10:32|| Front Page Top

#8 Where's Japan hiding the other kiloton?

That's what I wanted to know.

So I found a web site that purports to convert from metric and it says 331kg = 0.3649 tons. So lets see, I'm not good at math but Windows has a little calculator and it says 1 - 0.3649 = 0.6351 as in 0.6351 tons or 576.15kg out of the original shipment of one ton from France to Japan. I'm no nuclear physicist either but that sounds like a lotta plutonium for which this article does not account. Gotta wonder if some of it is aimed at Pudgy or maybe the Chicoms.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2016-03-08 13:24||   2016-03-08 13:24|| Front Page Top

#9 This missing stuff's not in munitions:
Grab geiger and gaff and go fishin'.
The nuclear creatures
Peculiar new features
Outshine any fisherman's fiction.
Posted by Ivy Isotope 2016-03-08 13:56||   2016-03-08 13:56|| Front Page Top

#10 The Bammer = OWG Co-Superpower USA must decide whether a MilPol-resurgent/assertive, Nukulaar-armed Japan is what it nominally or de facto needs or requires for counterbalance agz Co-Superpower China.

Again, BEIJING = sees China-n-Only-China as the "US-style/par" Leader in East Asia-WESTPAC + any OWG Global Federal Union(s) developed therein.

IN ROUGHT PARITY OR EQUALITY WID THE US, NOT INFERIOR TO THE US, WHICH IS WHY CHINA IS DOING WHATS DOING IN THE EAST, SOUTH CHINA SEAS, TAIWAN, + IOR.

'TIS WHY CHINA WANTS THE US TO GIVE UP 1/2 OF THE PACIFIC + PULL BACK TOWARDS HAWAII-EASTPAC ASAP AMAP BY 2020 NLT 2025. However imperfect the merits or outcome, Beijing's policies are oriented or geared to this end.

* BIGNEWSNETWORK, TOPIX > [Reuters] CHINA SEES LITTLE TO CHEER ABOUT IN IMPROVING TIES WID "TWO-FACED" [double-dealing/crossing, duplicitous] JAPAN.

* JAPAN TIMES > OPINION/COMMENTARY: DAVID BANDOW: SHOULD SEOUL [South Korea] GO NUCLEAR?

US THAAD + Putin'S S-400 BMAADS in Siberia + Nuke-armed NOKOR, SOKOR?, + JAPAN?, ... ... Etc. to come = CHINA FEELING SURROUNDED LIKE CUSTER???

China's OWG Co-Superpower siblings RUSSIA + IRAN to get their newfound "Spheres of Influence" BUT NOT CHINA PER SE - SORRY, BUT I DON'T THINK BEIJING [or Other Wannabes] IS GONNA STAND FOR THAT.

* GLOBALNATION.PH > CHINA WON'T BUDGE ON SOUTH SEA SOVEREIGNTY.

You knew China wouldn't.

* TOPIX > [Washington Times] CHINA AMBITIONS MAKE BARACK OBAMA KNUCKLE UNDER.

Again, as a Anti-US US OWG-NWO Globalist the Bammer is doing it INTENTIONALLY.

WILL THE BAMMER = USA ACCEPT A POST-COLLAPSE NOKOR TAKEN OVER OR FORMALLY ANNEXED BY CHINA, PEACEFULLY OR FORCEFULLY???

DITTO ACCEPTING A JAPAN + SOKOR, ETAL. IN EAST ASIA-WESTPAC SUBORNED UNDER OWG B-U-T UNDER CHINA'S DOMINATION???

These are important questions which the Globies have NOT answered but are covertly still proceeding with in dedicated agendum, ULTIMATELY PUTTING OR EXPOSING THE US-WORLD TO A LOT OF POTEN EXISTENTIAL DANGER.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2016-03-08 23:42||   2016-03-08 23:42|| Front Page Top

23:58 Zenobia Floger6220
23:42 JosephMendiola
23:36 Raj
23:24 rjschwarz
23:21 rjschwarz
23:16 rjschwarz
23:16 rjschwarz
23:15 rjschwarz
23:08 JosephMendiola
22:48 JosephMendiola
21:57 Skidmark
21:50 Mullah Richard
21:27 Besoeker
20:25 Frank G
19:53 JosephMendiola
19:48 JosephMendiola
19:41 JosephMendiola
19:32 European Conservative
19:31 Shipman
19:28 Shipman
18:44 Rambler in Virginia
18:26 swksvolFF
18:20 Rex Mundi
18:12 JohnQC









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com