Article

2016-03-17 -Lurid Crime Tales-

Beest Sent Dozens Of Emails On Her BlackBerry From Russia And China, Raising Risk Profile

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Besoeker 2016-03-17 03:26|| || Front Page|| [4 views ] Top

#1 Too bad we can't hack the KGB (successor) files to find out what was in Hillary's missing e-mails...
Seriously, people just do not seem to comprehend the national security risk posed by her indifference to internet security - count on the Russians and Chinese having sensitive or compromising Clinton e-mails (personal or government) which they WILL use to 'control' her should she be elected President.

Posted by Glenmore 2016-03-17 07:55|| 2016-03-17 07:55|| Front Page Top

#2 It is unclear how Clinton’s server was configured.

With Mr. Pagliano' assistance, clarity should be forthcoming.

Posted by Besoeker 2016-03-17 08:03|| 2016-03-17 08:03|| Front Page Top

#3 people just do not seem to comprehend the national security risk

A lot of people do. But the ones who don't say, "Everybody does it," and "It's just a witch hunt, like Bill Clinton's bimbo eruptions." Point out that some of those bimbos were respectable professional women who claimed to have been raped, and this is the first time they've heard anything like that, so it must not be true.

Posted by trailing wife 2016-03-17 08:20|| 2016-03-17 08:20|| Front Page Top

#4 Russian officials are not on the witness list of Judicial Watch however maybe the discovery process will get to the bottom of Hillary's continuous prevarication. Maybe U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan should be considered for a SCOTUS appointment down the line.

Witness list

Posted by JohnQC 2016-03-17 09:36|| 2016-03-17 09:36|| Front Page Top

#5 If it's proven Clinton not only "could have" but indeed "did" comprimise security it's a game changer. It's likely there's people that already know the answer to that question. Sources and methods...

Posted by DepotGuy 2016-03-17 13:37|| 2016-03-17 13:37|| Front Page Top

#6 If it's proven Clinton not only "could have" but indeed "did" comprimise security it's a game changer.

Therefore, it will NOT be proven.

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-03-17 16:17|| 2016-03-17 16:17|| Front Page Top

#7 Simply Criminal. Clearly Criminal.

18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

Posted by Chusong Dark Lord of the Algonquins6851 2016-03-17 23:00|| 2016-03-17 23:00|| Front Page Top

23:45 jvalentour
23:22 Procopius2k
23:16 Heriberto Splat6450
23:15 Snakes Sproing3870
23:10 Fleans Angish6390
23:05 Thor Splat3669
23:00 Chusong Dark Lord of the Algonquins6851
22:55 Chunky Hupinegum7348
22:50 Skunky Snusomble4733
22:18 NoMoreBS
21:53 Betty White1068
21:50 Skidmark
21:47 Skidmark
21:39 Betty White1068
21:32 Skidmark
21:32 European Conservative
21:25 Richard Aubrey
21:22 Skidmark
21:12 junkiron
20:59 Frank G
20:58 Frank G
20:58 trailing wife
20:52 trailing wife
20:45 trailing wife