Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 06/03/2016 View Thu 06/02/2016 View Wed 06/01/2016 View Tue 05/31/2016 View Mon 05/30/2016 View Sun 05/29/2016 View Sat 05/28/2016
1
2016-06-03 Home Front: Politix
California law would allow prosecution of climate-change skeptics
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by badanov 2016-06-03 00:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views ]  Top

#1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2016-06-03 06:10||   2016-06-03 06:10|| Front Page Top

#2 Fascists idiots have taken over Kalifornia. The dominant left wingnut populace is probably too stoned to notice or care.
Posted by JohnQC 2016-06-03 06:50||   2016-06-03 06:50|| Front Page Top

#3 But by the time it is overturned, the damage will have been done and the fascists who wrote the law in the first place will skate.

Conspiracy to violate civil rights. It's not that they can't be held accountable, there is just no will to enforce it.
Posted by Procopius2k 2016-06-03 07:49||   2016-06-03 07:49|| Front Page Top

#4 It's not that they can't be held accountable, there is just no will to enforce it

All according to plan, P2k.
Posted by Mullah Richard 2016-06-03 09:40||   2016-06-03 09:40|| Front Page Top

#5 Try to stop us, fucktards. You will be shot if you come to arrest us.

Get it?

You. WILL. Be. Shot.

Dead.
Posted by DarthVader 2016-06-03 10:26||   2016-06-03 10:26|| Front Page Top

#6 Fortunately, the bill died.

A landmark bill allowing for the prosecution of climate change dissent effectively died Thursday after the California Senate failed to take it up before the deadline.

Senate Bill 1161, or the California Climate Science Truth and Accountability Act of 2016, would have authorized prosecutors to sue fossil fuel companies, think tanks and others that have “deceived or misled the public on the risks of climate change.”


I think they wanted the anti-gun bills to pass first before they felt brave enough to pass this one.

Disarm, then devoice. Classic path to tyranny.
Posted by DarthVader 2016-06-03 10:53||   2016-06-03 10:53|| Front Page Top

#7 The bill's sponsors knew it wouldn't pass. They were just grandstanding to enhance their street creds.
Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2016-06-03 12:17||   2016-06-03 12:17|| Front Page Top

#8 Even though it failed, they'll try again and again.

Kind of like school referendums.
Posted by Mullah Richard 2016-06-03 14:19||   2016-06-03 14:19|| Front Page Top

#9 It's still conspiracy even if it didn't pass. All the names on the sponsor listing are public record.
Posted by Procopius2k 2016-06-03 17:00||   2016-06-03 17:00|| Front Page Top

#10 It can fail a thousand times...

... it just has to pass once.
Posted by CrazyFool 2016-06-03 20:56||   2016-06-03 20:56|| Front Page Top

#11 All the names on the sponsor listing are public record.

Maybe some of them should have a spot of bad luck come their way.
Posted by One Eyed Big Foot1131 2016-06-03 21:11||   2016-06-03 21:11|| Front Page Top

23:21 Phereper mike
22:59 Thing From Trump Mountain
21:52 M. Murcek
21:11 badanov
21:11 One Eyed Big Foot1131
20:59 Frank G
20:56 CrazyFool
20:27 Bangkok Billy
19:52 Charles
19:48 USN, Ret.
19:10 M. Murcek
18:23 SteveS
18:08 Shipman
17:44 Shipman
17:28 SteveS
17:23 SteveS
17:20 Ebbang Uluque6305
17:18 Shipman
17:13 Ebbang Uluque6305
17:00 Procopius2k
16:44 Silentbrick
15:58 Thing From Snowy Mountain
15:12 Old Patriot
15:11 Old Patriot









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com