Article

2016-07-08 Home Front: WoT

US House speaker formally asks that Clinton be denied classified data

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2016-07-08 00:00|| || Front Page|| [5 views ] Top

#1 Her access should have been suspended long, long ago. A suspension of access requires no civil or criminal conviction. I doubt it will happen however. A TS/SCI and sensitive 'read-on's' are conditions of employment.

Just another example of the double standard.

Posted by Besoeker 2016-07-08 03:36|| 2016-07-08 03:36|| Front Page Top

#2 I doubt it will happen however

Me either after watching the Clinton Kabuki theater for the past few decades--especially the more recent Benghazi and emailgate. I don't think anything is going to come from the money-laundering investigation either. The taint of lawlessness.

Posted by JohnQC 2016-07-08 07:04|| 2016-07-08 07:04|| Front Page Top

#3 The question I always look at is, is there evidence that would establish beyond a reasonable doubt

I thought 'reasonable doubt' was the province of the jury, Jimbo. You decided for the jury.

Posted by Bobby 2016-07-08 07:34|| 2016-07-08 07:34|| Front Page Top

#4 Not a jury event.
Access can be pulled by local authority for any reason.

Posted by Skidmark 2016-07-08 09:54|| 2016-07-08 09:54|| Front Page Top

#5 .....or suspicion, pending the outcome of an investigation or review.

Posted by Besoeker 2016-07-08 10:09|| 2016-07-08 10:09|| Front Page Top

#6 A TS/SCI level clearance is not only required to view classified documents, it is also required for access to secure areas, secure briefings, secure communications links, and discussions. A TS/SCI is base requirement for higher level accesses and read-on's.

My guess is she's still got her clearance and will maintain it without suspension.

Posted by Besoeker 2016-07-08 10:17|| 2016-07-08 10:17|| Front Page Top

#7 You have to ask, against which agency is that TS/SCI clearance charged? SOmewhere, there is an SSO or clearance control officer who holds the responsibility for it is it is still in place. That individual should be the focus of the Congressional oversight, and walk up the chain in public to the DNC and the WH to prove that we aren't a nation of laws anymore, just peons and patricians.

Posted by NoMoreBS 2016-07-08 14:54|| 2016-07-08 14:54|| Front Page Top

#8 If I had to guess, I suspect her tickets are still held at Foggy Bottom. But that's just a guess.

Posted by Besoeker 2016-07-08 14:56|| 2016-07-08 14:56|| Front Page Top

23:57 Skidmark
23:50 Skidmark
23:45 newc
22:49 Bill Clinton
22:46 Bill Clinton
22:30 Jack Thrusock5234
21:43 Frank G
21:35 Fred
20:58 Whiskey Mike
20:53 Whiskey Mike
20:53 DarthVader
20:49 Rob Crawford
20:30 josephMendiola
20:27 josephMendiola
20:17 Whurt Angeamp5485
20:11 Glinesh Unung4707
20:02 Pappy
20:00 Pappy
19:39 Alaska Paul
19:04 Percy McCoy7690
17:37 Deacon Blues
17:37 SteveS
17:25 SteveS
16:12 trailing wife