Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 09/13/2016 View Mon 09/12/2016 View Sun 09/11/2016 View Sat 09/10/2016 View Fri 09/09/2016 View Thu 09/08/2016 View Wed 09/07/2016
1
2016-09-13 Home Front: Politix
Hillary Clinton's Campaign Needs To Hire Better Liars
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2016-09-13 00:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views ]  Top

#1 The quality of their liars doesn't matter.

She could kill a puppy, a kitten, and a newborn on live television. Immediately after doing so at least 90 percent of the "professional media" would scramble to explain what "provoked" her to do so (and why we should be ok with it). And 45% of the voters would immediately write it off as "At least she didn't insult anyone like Trump likes to do".

People who actually believe in right and wrong have to step up. Conversations that are "uncomfortable" have to take place. Hillary isn't "a woman who might be the first woman president". Instead, she's a sack of evil shit that has to be denounced at every turn.
Posted by Crusader 2016-09-13 00:07||   2016-09-13 00:07|| Front Page Top

#2 Nah. They are about as skilled as you get. Hillary's lied so much that we have lost all ability to know whether or not she is telling the truth about anything. I've taken the approach that whenever she or her apparatchiks open their mouths, I assume they are lying. What about Slick Willy (What's the meaning of "Is.") and Obama (If you like your insurance and your doctor, you can keep them)? They've got this down pretty damn good.
Posted by JohnQC 2016-09-13 10:04||   2016-09-13 10:04|| Front Page Top

#3 whenever she or her apparatchiks open their mouths, I assume they are lying

But, JQC, this only works 95% of the time.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-09-13 10:06||   2016-09-13 10:06|| Front Page Top

#4 The quality of the lies is key.

If she had pneumonia and they claimed the flu instead of deny, deny, deny they would have gotten sympathy and a free pass for a weekend or more of rest.

If she has something worse than pneumonia you claim pneumonia because people know it is serious when you are old but goes away (or the patient does) so if she survives it wouldn't effect her Presidency.

I think the quality of her lies is so poor because the sycophants in the media copy/paste even the most insane lies with a smile. They have done her a disservice by letting her natural Clinton lying muscles go flabby.
Posted by rjschwarz 2016-09-13 18:08||   2016-09-13 18:08|| Front Page Top

#5 "not infectious" but she poses with the prop child and her staff is also coming down with it
Posted by Frank G 2016-09-13 18:46||   2016-09-13 18:46|| Front Page Top

#6 her staff is also Supposedly coming down with it

I think that's bullshit
Posted by Frank G 2016-09-13 19:11||   2016-09-13 19:11|| Front Page Top

23:49 Silentbrick
23:26 Bov Flimbers
22:29 rjschwarz
22:28 rjschwarz
22:27 rjschwarz
21:58 Frank G
21:40 Lonzo Omoluger2627
21:03 Bov Flimbers
21:01 badanov
20:53 Frank G
20:50 Frank G
20:34 49 pan
20:33 49 pan
20:25 Thor Lumumba3940
20:22 Procopius2k
20:20 Deacon Blues
20:11 Frank G
20:11 phil_b
20:09 Uninemp Huperesing9789
20:08 Pappy
20:08 JohnQC
20:07 Pappy
20:06 JohnQC
19:59 JohnQC









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com