Article

2016-09-26 Home Front: Politix

The FBI Investigation of EmailGate Was a Sham

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Blossom Unains5562 2016-09-26 00:00|| || Front Page|| [3 views ] Top

#1 “It can be held certain that information that is withheld or suppressed contains truths that are detrimental to the persons involved in the suppression.”

J. Edgar Hoover

Posted by Herb Johnson7035 2016-09-26 00:59|| 2016-09-26 00:59|| Front Page Top

#2 Was there ever a question?

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-09-26 01:46|| 2016-09-26 01:46|| Front Page Top

#3 I suspect there was an admonishment from Bill Clinton to Loretta Lynch at Sky Harbor airport to 'save the president.' But only a guess.

Posted by Besoeker 2016-09-26 05:40|| 2016-09-26 05:40|| Front Page Top

#4 #2 Was there ever a question? Alas grom, I've got to admit I was suckered in--my naivete got the best of me. I started to get suspicious when Obama said there was not a scintilla of evidence prior to any investigation. Later, we found that he too lied because a POTUS pseudonym showed up in Hillary's garden patch server emails according to her body-woman Huma. Hillary then said with great certainty that there was nothing to see and that she would not be indicted. That is probably the only thing in her life she has not lied about. (After all, I should have known better--she lies about everything, the time of day, the day of the week, her severe illness, video tapes, Benghazi, Bosnia, her husband getting BJs in the WH, and on an on. She lied about the emails and during the cover-up.) She then sent hubby Slick to Phoenix to ~~meet with~~ remind Loretta of those things which are important to her. It was confirmed when , shortly after, Comey all-but-indicted her and then said it couldn't be done. This came right out of left field. So yeah, I guess I was naïve and suckered. Wasn't everyone?

Posted by JohnQC 2016-09-26 08:48|| 2016-09-26 08:48|| Front Page Top

#5 I guess I was naïve and suckered. Wasn't everyone?

Simply because none of us wished to believe it.

Posted by Besoeker 2016-09-26 08:50|| 2016-09-26 08:50|| Front Page Top

#6
Obama’s Conflict Tanked the Clinton E-mail Investigation — As Predicted

Stasi-like, no?

Posted by Vast Right Wing Conspiracy 2016-09-26 09:58|| 2016-09-26 09:58|| Front Page Top

#7 Hillary couldn't be proven without the president being proven guilty as well and that would mean impeachment was called for and that was not going to happen as well.

Posted by JohnQC 2016-09-26 10:08|| 2016-09-26 10:08|| Front Page Top

#8 What little regard I had remaining for the FBI... and it was minuscule, is totally gone.

Posted by Besoeker 2016-09-26 16:22|| 2016-09-26 16:22|| Front Page Top

#9 I never say I told you so, and I don't like people who do. But, I TOLD YOU SO.

Posted by regular joe 2016-09-26 16:37|| 2016-09-26 16:37|| Front Page Top

23:59 KBK
23:49 3dc
23:45 trailing wife
23:34 Sock Puppet of Doom
23:34 badanov
23:31 Alaska Paul
23:28 CrazyFool
23:15 Alaska Paul
23:00 trailing wife
22:55 Procopius2k
22:40 Blossom Unains5562
22:38 trailing wife
22:30 Blossom Unains5562
22:20 Blossom Unains5562
22:10 trailing wife
22:04 Frank G
22:00 Barbara
21:56 Barbara
21:54 Frank G
21:47 badanov
21:44 Blossom Unains5562
21:39 SteveS
21:33 james
21:14 swksvolFF