Article

2016-10-19 -Lurid Crime Tales-

FBI official at center of alleged Clinton email 'quid pro quo' speaks out

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Besoeker 2016-10-19 00:00|| || Front Page|| [7 views ] Top

#1 Dear FBI,

In light of recent developments extending upwards to and through the Justice Department, I am hereby removing "Patriotic Duty" from any consideration involving your department.

Thank you.

Posted by Jiggs Fillmore9040 2016-10-19 13:35|| 2016-10-19 13:35|| Front Page Top

#2 WSJ: ‘Rigged’ Was Hillary Clinton’s FBI Case
Democrats are lucky in Trump but the scandal will follow her to the White House.

Donald Trump probably is not helping his cause much with his conspiracy-mongering about a “rigged” election but Democrats should be thankful for small favors.

Mr. Trump lacks message discipline. Instead of scattershot claims that the race is being manipulated, wild conspiracy theories about ballot box-stuffing, which both parties and Americans of decency and goodwill strongly refute, he might be focusing laser-like on the “rigged” argument that nobody can confidently refute.

That’s the argument that Hillary Clinton is her party’s nominee and on her way to the White House only because the Obama administration decided to waive the law on handling classified material—and the FBI went along—in order to assure that its designated heiress would succeed to the presidency.

Google says the question “is Trump trying to lose?” has skyrocketed in popularity in the last few days. Mr. Trump is perhaps willing to be president but hasn’t been willing to do what was necessary to win. He never seriously tried to expand beyond his core support. He never wanted to spend the money, especially on TV advertising, that would be needed to do so.

If today’s Democratic campaign were being fought against a generic Republican without Mr. Trump’s distinct qualities and history, here’s what would dominate the news:

Mrs. Clinton was verbally convicted by the FBI chief for mishandling classified information yet somehow not formally charged.

Her aides were allowed to cut curious deals with FBI investigators that effectively swept under the rug any possible charges against them for obstruction or evidence tampering.

Those same aides have been revealed, through email leaks, to have freely mixed public and private interests, including their own and Clinton private interests, in the performance of jobs that, in some cases, saw them receiving salaries from the Clinton Foundation or the Clinton family even as they also worked for the taxpayer at the State Department.

The State Department itself, during Mrs. Clinton’s time as secretary, operated as an extension of the Clinton Foundation when it came to handling the requests and advancing the interests of important Clinton Foundation donors, some of which were foreign governments.

The latest email leak, likely at the hands of Russian hackers, shows the State Department negotiating with the FBI over the classification status of Mrs. Clinton’s private emails in search of reducing her legal jeopardy.

Here’s what we can expect after Election Day: Democrats will claim that a sweeping victory over Mr. Trump is a mandate for policies that were hardly talked about during a campaign focused on the shortcomings of Mr. Trump’s treatment of women. If Democrats don’t win the House, Mrs. Clinton will adopt President Obama’s strategy of aggressively using executive orders to expand Washington’s dominance of the private sector while painting Republicans as obstructionists.

Those who reason that Mrs. Clinton and House Speaker Paul Ryan have histories and temperaments suited to cooperation and see hope for bipartisan progress will be disappointed. Why? Because of the steady drip of email leaks. Because of new information challenging the quality and objectivity of the FBI investigation.

Mrs. Clinton, like Nixon in 1972, may not get a honeymoon no matter how big her win. The debate we aren’t having in the campaign, we will continue not to have: how to foster a modern state that doesn’t metastasize corruption, cronyism, elites helping themselves. There will be no bipartisan action on things that ail the American economy and hold back its growth. All of Washington will be enmeshed in a replay of the Watergate era, inward-looking, destructive, consumed with investigations and score-settling.

Of course, much will depend on how the vote for control of Congress goes, and whether Mrs. Clinton has an unsuspected gift for creative political leadership that somehow can give the GOP a stake in her success—as Mr. Obama so signally failed to do. Pleasant surprises are always possible. Don’t bet on one.

Wall Street Journal Link

Posted by Besoeker 2016-10-19 13:45|| 2016-10-19 13:45|| Front Page Top

#3 If today’s Democratic campaign were being fought against a generic Republican without Mr. Trump’s distinct qualities and history, here’s what would dominate the news:

LOL - B, you're not that naive. It would be "Generic Republican is against wymyns, minorities, children, ...is a closet fascist, doesn't want you to get your entitlements....."

Posted by Frank G 2016-10-19 14:46|| 2016-10-19 14:46|| Front Page Top

#4 B,
Humm, rigged elections.
I seem to remember LBJ'c congressional election going down in history as rigged. Al Frankin and his friendly felons reek of vote rigging. Chicago....
Boston....

Posted by jvalentour 2016-10-19 23:32|| 2016-10-19 23:32|| Front Page Top

23:45 European Conservative
23:32 jvalentour
23:18 jvalentour
22:43 Iblis
22:41 Blossom Unains5562
22:04 Blossom Unains5562
21:53 Blossom Unains5562
21:49 Whiskey Mike
21:45 Whiskey Mike
21:42 Whiskey Mike
21:36 Bobby
21:14 lord garth
20:42 JohnQC
20:40 JohnQC
20:39 Frank G
20:36 Frank G
20:34 Frank G
20:30 Frank G
20:29 Frank G
20:18 Thereck Chutle5003
20:10 Jack salami
19:57 M. Murcek
19:52 Pappy
19:42 Frank G