Article

2016-12-01 Government

Congress Wants to Know Why Soldiers, Marines Don't Use the Same Rifle Ammo

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Skidmark 2016-12-01 11:28|| || Front Page|| [4 views ] Top

#1 Because the Marines use the M16 rifle and the Army uses the M4 carbine? Different powder formulations and bullet compositions for the two barrel lengths.

Posted by Fluper Click1940 2016-12-01 16:26|| 2016-12-01 16:26|| Front Page Top

#2 The M855 is a lead bullet with a steel core.

The M855A1 is a tungsten bullet with a copper wrapped steel core.

During testing, the M855A1 performed better than M80 7.62×51mm NATO ball ammunition against certain types of targets (particularly hardened steel), blurring the performance differences that previously separated the two cartridges. The US Army Picatinny Arsenal stated that the new M855A1 offers improved hard target capability, more consistent performance at all distances, enhanced dependability, improved accuracy, reduced muzzle flash, and higher velocity compared to the M855 round. Further, the Army stated the new M855A1 ammunition is tailored for use in M4 carbines, but should also give enhanced performance in M16 rifles and M249 light machine guns. The new 62-grain (4 g) projectile or bullet used in the M855A1 round has a copper core with a 19-grain (1.2 g) steel "stacked-cone" penetrating tip. The M855A1 cartridge is sometimes referred to as "green ammo" because it fires a lead free projectile.[67][68][77][78][79][80] It is not necessarily more lethal than the M855, but performs more consistently every time it hits a soft target and retains its performance at longer distances. The EPR can penetrate a 3⁄8 in (9.5 mm) thick steel barrier from an M4 at 350 meters and from an M16 at 400 meters. Ballistics for both rounds are similar and don't require weapons to be re-zeroed, but if they are the EPR can be slightly more accurate. The steel-tip penetrator of the M855A1 is noticeably separated from the jacket of the bullet and can spin, but this is part of the design and does not affect performance. The M855A1 costs only 5 cents more per round than the M855.[81] The M855A1 bullet has a 1⁄8 in (3.2 mm) greater length than the M855.[82] Because steel and copper are less dense than lead, the bullet is lengthened inside the case to achieve the same weight as its predecessor.

Posted by DarthVader 2016-12-01 16:58|| 2016-12-01 16:58|| Front Page Top

#3 One uses 'old' stuff, really old stuff. If it ain't leaking, they don't want it.

The other is forced to use the most advance green ~~crap~~ materials grafters can supply. Simply following orders of elected officials.

Posted by Procopius2k 2016-12-01 18:43|| 2016-12-01 18:43|| Front Page Top

23:56 KBK
23:46 KBK
23:44 gorb
23:42 gorb
23:28 gorb
23:27 gorb
23:02 newc
22:38 newc
22:34 newc
22:34 Injun Bucket8891
22:21 Barbara
21:44 james
21:43 james
21:43 Procopius2k
21:28 james
21:12 Glenmore in Mt Vernon
21:10 Omomort Cheager7040
20:57 Skidmark
20:35 AlanC
20:32 Fluper Click1940
20:30 Skidmark
20:30 AlanC
20:26 AlanC
20:21 Skidmark