Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 12/06/2016 View Mon 12/05/2016 View Sun 12/04/2016 View Sat 12/03/2016 View Fri 12/02/2016 View Thu 12/01/2016 View Wed 11/30/2016
1
2016-12-06 Home Front: Politix
Trump to meet with Kissinger Tuesday
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2016-12-06 06:23|| || Front Page|| [2 views ]  Top

#1 If you want to explore the mind spark of the Clinton Foundation, and the chicanery of globalization, look no further than Kissinger Associates model.

I have no idea why Trump would meet with this man or Al Gore. Perhaps his motivations will be revealed in due time.
Posted by Besoeker 2016-12-06 06:36||   2016-12-06 06:36|| Front Page Top

#2 Gul Dukat: Anyone can blow up a ship. Ha! But to look your enemy in the eye, knowing you'll remember his face for the rest of your life, now that takes... a stomach, much stronger than you'll ever have.

(See also - Romney)
Posted by Procopius2k 2016-12-06 08:20||   2016-12-06 08:20|| Front Page Top

#3 He might be meeting them to actually understand what he will be fighting against.

'Know thy enemy'.
Posted by Mullah Richard 2016-12-06 08:32||   2016-12-06 08:32|| Front Page Top

#4 So Kissinger is Boskone?
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-12-06 09:06||   2016-12-06 09:06|| Front Page Top

#5 I have no idea why Trump would meet with this man or Al Gore. Perhaps his motivations will be revealed in due time.

Kissinger is China's emissary to the US. Xi has told Kissinger to lay down the law, and the Donald had better prostrate himself, or else... We'll see soon enough what Trump is made of. Bush was all set to confront China, especially after the EP-3 incident, but was sidetracked by 9/11 and the punitive expeditions into Afghanistan and Iraq that turned into expensive nation-building exercises.
Posted by Zhang Fei 2016-12-06 10:32||   2016-12-06 10:32|| Front Page Top

#6 Ref #5: Probably more truth than speculation.
Posted by Besoeker 2016-12-06 10:34||   2016-12-06 10:34|| Front Page Top

#7 I can understand how Nixon wanted detente with China just like he did with the Soviets. That doesn't mean we have to kowtow to them.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2016-12-06 12:42||   2016-12-06 12:42|| Front Page Top

#8 If your premise is the US went off-track after the cold war then it makes sense to talk to some of the foreign policy experts from before before the end of the cold war and get their take.
Posted by rjschwarz 2016-12-06 23:33||   2016-12-06 23:33|| Front Page Top

23:51 CrazyFool
23:33 rjschwarz
23:31 rjschwarz
23:23 rjschwarz
23:05 gorb
22:52 gorb
21:52 USN, Ret.
21:38 Pappy
20:44 Blossom Unains5562
20:21 Glenmore
20:15 Rob Crawford
20:13 Rob Crawford
19:56 phil_b
19:36 trailing wife
19:28 phil_b
19:16 phil_b
19:11 trailing wife
19:01 charger
18:46 Tholuger Whereng4960
18:43 Grarong Spawn of the Heathen Rus2966
18:41 Frank G
18:40 Frank G
18:37 Frank G
18:36 Threth Cruting5459









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com