Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 12/23/2016 View Thu 12/22/2016 View Wed 12/21/2016 View Tue 12/20/2016 View Mon 12/19/2016 View Sun 12/18/2016 View Sat 12/17/2016
1
2016-12-23 Home Front: Culture Wars
Court dismisses Michael Mann defamation lawsuit against National Review
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-12-23 05:17|| || Front Page|| [5 views ]  Top

#1 Thief was my fave Mann flick. James Caan was fantastic.
Posted by M. Murcek 2016-12-23 07:52||   2016-12-23 07:52|| Front Page Top

#2 One hockey stick broken. Mark Steyn's win is next.
Posted by Heriberto Greper9897 2016-12-23 08:28||   2016-12-23 08:28|| Front Page Top

#3 More important finding of the Court was that the lawsuit against Steyn and Simberg may continue.

That is awful. Mann's lawsuit should have been dismissed within a month of its filing.

Posted by lord garth 2016-12-23 08:42||   2016-12-23 08:42|| Front Page Top

#4 After wading through the double and triple negatives involved in the court's finding, I found the 100 page opinion to be a useful discussion of the issues and law involved in considering whether an article or blog could be construed as actionable defamation. As such, it may be worth the time of any site owner or moderater.

While the National Review is off the hook for its editorial on the lawsuit, that is certainly not the case for the Simberg and Stein articles. The case will be tried. They will have to defend their defamatory allegations of scientific misconduct. Good luck, but it doesn't look good, in my opinion.

The opinion concludes, "Dr. Mann has supplied sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that statements in the articles written by Mr. Simberg and Mr. Steyn were false, defamatory, and published by appellants to third parties, and, by clear and convincing evidence, that appellants did so with actual malice."
Posted by KBK 2016-12-23 11:26||   2016-12-23 11:26|| Front Page Top

23:53 49 Pan
22:49 gorb
22:45 Lionel Gonque2389
22:37 SteveS
22:21 Frank G
21:12 Barbara
21:08 Barbara
21:04 Sgt.D.T.
20:28 Blossom Unains5562
20:27 Blossom Unains5562
19:31 Jeasing Creque5352
19:23 Anon1
19:08 Procopius2k
18:50 Thusoth Snore8458
18:15 USN, Ret.
17:47 Mullah Richard
16:52 Sonny Spolugum9932
16:50 Sheba Ebbeater9853
16:49 gorb
16:22 magpie
16:14 Whiskey Mike
16:11 AlanC
16:02 Injun Bucket8891
16:00 Shipman









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com