Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 12/29/2016 View Wed 12/28/2016 View Tue 12/27/2016 View Mon 12/26/2016 View Sun 12/25/2016 View Sat 12/24/2016 View Fri 12/23/2016
1
2016-12-29 Home Front: Politix
Gov. Jerry Brown: California Will Work With Foreign Gov’t On Climate Policies
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2016-12-29 00:00|| || Front Page|| [3 views ]  Top

#1 ...his state will bypass Washington, D.C., and work instead with foreign governments on ways to reduce climate change.

Sounds illegal as all hell - go for it, Moonbeam!
Posted by Raj 2016-12-29 00:35||   2016-12-29 00:35|| Front Page Top

#2 The independent country of California. Fine, kick them loose, no US tax payer money and no water for them. Let Mexico take it back.
Posted by Jeasing Creque5352 2016-12-29 03:14||   2016-12-29 03:14|| Front Page Top

#3 Under Obama when Texas at threatened to seceed people complained. Now that caliphornia threatens to seceded, people applaud. Tells you something doesn't it.
Posted by Nero White 3083 2016-12-29 07:26||   2016-12-29 07:26|| Front Page Top

#4 Under Obama when Texas at threatened to seceed people complained. Now that caliphornia threatens to seceded, people applaud. Tells you something doesn't it.

Indeed it does Nero. It tells us almost as much as the tens of millions who voted for HRC.
Posted by Besoeker 2016-12-29 07:41||   2016-12-29 07:41|| Front Page Top

#5 Sounds good to me moonbeam.

Destroy your own economy and leave ours alone.
Posted by DarthVader 2016-12-29 07:57||   2016-12-29 07:57|| Front Page Top

#6 Uncredentialed foreign agent?  I think there's a law about that...
Posted by M. Murcek 2016-12-29 09:40||   2016-12-29 09:40|| Front Page Top

#7 I hope Trump pulls funding for that BS high speed train between LA and SF when he gets into office. That's just a way to transfer money into CA coffers as a reward for throwing themselves on the sword of liberal policies.
Posted by gorb 2016-12-29 11:35||   2016-12-29 11:35|| Front Page Top

#8 I suppose this is the part where the rest of y'all are going to be unionist and constitutional and all that bullshit and keep the rest of us from putting Tariffs on goods California wants to export to our states?
Posted by Thing From Snowy Mountain 2016-12-29 11:50||   2016-12-29 11:50|| Front Page Top

#9 ...no,no. I want to renegotiate the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo to return most of the coasties to Mexico. Then deal with Mexico over NAFTA as Trump has articulated.
Posted by Procopius2k 2016-12-29 12:17||   2016-12-29 12:17|| Front Page Top

#10 Sigh. P2K, please tell me you're joking.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2016-12-29 13:36||   2016-12-29 13:36|| Front Page Top

#11 Re #7: CA asked for a $15 M Federal loan for some of the High Speed train stations and 'stuff;' The loan request was submitted before the election when it was a sure thing Cankles would get elected.

Well she didn't and the loan was rejected. Now Moonbeam is way short of $$ for his Lionelfromhell.
Posted by USN, Ret. 2016-12-29 14:34||   2016-12-29 14:34|| Front Page Top

#12 Ref #11: I'll bet Moonbeam isn't the only one left holding an empty purse. I fear for Trump and Pence from now through inauguration day. I hope their security details are up to scratch. I suspect there are people out there who would do anything to prevent them from taking office.
Posted by Besoeker 2016-12-29 15:51||   2016-12-29 15:51|| Front Page Top

#13 That loan application was for $15 billion, with a B. Let's not be pikers. If you're gonna squander tax payers' money, do it big time.

Lame-Duck Obama Admin Rejects CA High-Speed Rail $15 Billion Loan

Technically, I like the idea of trains. A high speed train from LA to San Francisco would be good, if it could be done on time and budget without all the graft that one must expect with the criminals running California. Bakersfield to San Jose not so much.

Another good idea would be to put a real, functional subway system into LA. Driving in that town is a nightmare. The cost would be astronomical but the hours and the gasoline lost on those freeways are astronomical too. I know, I know. Just don't ask Texans to pay for it.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2016-12-29 16:45||   2016-12-29 16:45|| Front Page Top

#14 As for secession or the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, here's the deal:

We know that beginning with Bill Clinton or most likely with Bush Senior a drastic, almost biblical demographic redistribution was undertaken in the southwestern United States. We know that before then California, even with San Francisco and Los Angeles, was a red state that gave you presidents like Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan. We know that the demographic redistribution was largely responsible for turning California from red to blue and we know that was the purpose of the redistribution.

Wouldn't it be smarter to find a way to turn California back to red than giving it to Mexico? Let us consider the politics of the possible instead of the cynical. The first step, of course, would be to deport illegal aliens. We are a sovereign nation and we have a right to do so. Another step might be to defang and/or defund the university system and the teachers' union. If Democrats can mess with peoples' lives on a grand scale then so can Trump.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2016-12-29 16:59||   2016-12-29 16:59|| Front Page Top

23:42 Bov Flimbers
21:38 Blossom Unains5562
21:02 Silentbrick
20:22 Bright Pebbles
20:12 trailing wife
19:59 Bright Pebbles
19:56 Bright Pebbles
19:10 Alaska Paul
19:08 Alaska Paul
19:04 Pappy
18:45 anon1
18:41 anon1
18:28 swksvolFF
18:26 swksvolFF
18:11 Glenmore
18:08 Glenmore
18:06 Glenmore
17:49 Brian Williams
17:47 g(r)omgoru
17:20 ed in texas
17:20 swksvolFF
17:17 ed in texas
17:16 ed in texas
17:04 Vast Right Wing Conspiracy









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com