Article

2017-01-01 Down Under

Man Arrested for Sydney New Year Terror Threat

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by trailing wife 2017-01-01 07:12|| || Front Page|| [5 views ] Top

#1 this is the idiocy of "combating violent extremism"

and the stupidity of willfully ignoring the clash of civilisations which is what we are really in.

"Damien O'Neil" unless he is an Islamist convert, which is unlikely as he hasn't changed his name, has posted a few outrageous comments on FaceBook

SO now, under the new laws which destroyed our democratic societies, and the enlightenment principles that protected the individual against the state he's been jugged for this, thrown in the slammer and has no right to even tell his story to to a lawyer or to a fair court trial because as the word "terrorism" was used it is likely a "national security operation", triggering the NSA Bill 2014.

If asio is involved they can produce a letter that says "this is the truth, because we said so". And the court HAS to accept that as prima facie evidence. It's called "an evidenciary certificate". The court has no choice to disregard it. They cannot be cross-examined on this evidence.

So what a disgusting boot stamping on a human face forever that does NOTHING against the real problem of Islamism colonising the West and demanding sharia.

The Islamists are still colonising at the fastest rate ever thanks to mass migration rates.

They are still planning random stabbings and the police cannot stop them.

And they are still lobbying for sharia and for blasphemy laws and greater Muslim migration, and are winning, winning winning in Australia while the police chase the "Damien O'Neil"s of the world because "nothing to do with Islam".

Posted by anon1 2017-01-01 15:34|| 2017-01-01 15:34|| Front Page Top

#2 I was hoping for local perspective, anon1, because of the odd phrasing:

charged with offenses relating to suicide or encouragement of suicide, rather than terrorism laws.

but didn't know enough to frame the question. Thank you for weighing in.

Posted by trailing wife 2017-01-01 16:55|| 2017-01-01 16:55|| Front Page Top

23:52 USN, Ret.
23:47 Shipman
23:31 Shipman
23:28 Shipman
21:07 Hupack Smith9359
21:03 Bangkok Billy
19:58 AlanC
19:54 newc
19:36 Glenmore
19:05 SteveS
17:09 trailing wife
17:06 trailing wife
16:55 trailing wife
16:33 Jeasing Creque5352
15:56 Mike Kozlowski
15:40 anon1
15:34 anon1
14:49 AlanC
14:38 Raj
14:32 newc
14:32 Skidmark
14:14 Seeking cure for ignorance
14:07 magpie
13:15 Shipman