Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 02/04/2017 View Fri 02/03/2017 View Thu 02/02/2017 View Wed 02/01/2017 View Tue 01/31/2017 View Mon 01/30/2017 View Sun 01/29/2017
1
2017-02-04 Government
Secret Service: Reports of top-level resignations 'absolutely false'
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2017-02-04 00:00|| || Front Page|| [9 views ]  Top

#1 Kerry O'Grady, the agent in question, explained herself saying she viewed Trump's presidential candidacy as a "disaster" for the country...

Why isn't this bitch fired yet?
Posted by Crusader 2017-02-04 01:25||   2017-02-04 01:25|| Front Page Top

#2 Indira Gandhi had Sikh bodyguards who were her State Security. When her administration gave the Orders to Indian Army General Brar to take down the Bhindrinwal Rebellion takeover of the Golden Temple in Amritsar it resulted in several Sikh deaths including Bhindrinwal. Brar was himself a Sikh, but loyal. Bhindrinwal was a Rebel and disloyal.
In my opinion a State can not tolerate disloyalty for any reason if it is to remain a State. Bhindrinwal led a sect in opposition to the State. He set up machinguns in the Amritsar Golden temple. Brar moved against him. The army won.

In retaliation, State Security Sikh bodyguards machine gunned Indira Gandhi the Head of State to death in her own garden. 30,000 Sikhs all over India were murdered in the streets by ordinary citizens in retaliation. Imagine Schumer pulled into the street and doused with gasoline, or Madonna, and set alight in a screaming mob.

If a member of the State Secret Service in the US is disloyal she should be removed. Quickly and ruthlessly. If Trump doesn't want his own Secret Service Security to shoot him in the WH Rose Garden.. word to the wise. State Security is paramount . No toleration for disloyalty.

If this is Fake News it is a warning of a vulnerability. Fix it. Make sure it is a closed matter. The Left is disloyal. Tighten Security around the President. If the President is attacked imagine 30,000 Democrats attacked one at a time all over the US and set on fire in the streets in retaliation. True, the US is NOT India. But there is no love lost at present between the Hillary and Sanders Progs and the decent Americans who elected Trump. And the US Army is loyal to the Constitution and will put down any rebellion with extreme force.

The Left will do what it thinks it can get away with. Does anyone question that?
Posted by Clyde Sinatra8066 2017-02-04 06:25||   2017-02-04 06:25|| Front Page Top

#3 Clyde raises an interesting point. Yes indeed, if President Trump were to be assassinated it would most likely be an inside job. Sure, there could be a lone wolf, or a known wolf, or a splodydope, or a precision planned op from a well-financed and trained group, but the odds are on someone inside -- they have the access.

The interesting point is in the response. If this terrible event were to occur it might well provoke some extreme civil unrest. The hard left prog-tards would take to the streets in jubilation, Berkeley-style. At that point I think we'd see a some significant, armed push back from fly-over land. It would become bloody very quickly. Hot-tempered people on each side would drive this forward.

And I honestly don't know what would happen after that.
Posted by Steve White 2017-02-04 14:25||   2017-02-04 14:25|| Front Page Top

#4 Maybe the same sort of thing that would've happened had somebody bumped off the POTUS in 2009.
Posted by Bobby 2017-02-04 15:04||   2017-02-04 15:04|| Front Page Top

#5 Having lived through the 1960's after JFK was assassinated it was my opinion that this whole country went off the rails. There was Vietnam which was bad enough but then there were the hippies, the Yuppies, the Black Panthers, the Weathermen, etc. The whole country went full on bat shit crazy. We do NOT want that again.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2017-02-04 16:15||   2017-02-04 16:15|| Front Page Top

#6 Democrats should remind what happened last time they started a civil war.
Posted by JFM 2017-02-04 17:38||   2017-02-04 17:38|| Front Page Top

#7 Ah, but this time it will be different, #6 JFM. Honest!

/snark
Posted by Barbara 2017-02-04 17:46||   2017-02-04 17:46|| Front Page Top

#8 Keep digging. Not all is as appears.
Posted by Blossom Unains5562 2017-02-04 18:56||   2017-02-04 18:56|| Front Page Top

#9 If someone tries to take out the President Soros should be taken out. It's Soros money being used to agitate the population.
Posted by rjschwarz 2017-02-04 19:22||   2017-02-04 19:22|| Front Page Top

#10 #9 is spot on.
Posted by Crusader 2017-02-04 21:00||   2017-02-04 21:00|| Front Page Top

#11 "Having lived through the 1960's after JFK was assassinated it was my opinion that this whole country went off the rails. There was Vietnam which was bad enough but then there were the hippies, the Yuppies, the Black Panthers, the Weathermen, etc. The whole country went full on bat shit crazy. We do NOT want that again."

And all that shit was started and run by democrats - leftists.
Posted by newc 2017-02-04 21:24||   2017-02-04 21:24|| Front Page Top

23:44 Skidmark
23:41 Skidmark
23:30 Skidmark
23:24 Bangkok Billy
23:07 Elmerert Hupens2660
22:39 Barbara
21:39 rjschwarz
21:37 newc
21:35 Skidmark
21:30 Crusader
21:24 newc
21:14 ed in texas
21:00 Crusader
20:57 newc
20:57 Crusader
20:08 sjspecialist
19:57 KBK
19:53 phil_b
19:53 Blossom Unains5562
19:39 Pappy
19:38 Pappy
19:28 Pappy
19:24 Pappy
19:22 rjschwarz









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com