Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 02/05/2017 View Sat 02/04/2017 View Fri 02/03/2017 View Thu 02/02/2017 View Wed 02/01/2017 View Tue 01/31/2017 View Mon 01/30/2017
1
2017-02-05 -Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
Asia Times Essay: Look Back Anger Unplugged.
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by 3dc 2017-02-05 00:10|| || Front Page|| [1 views ]  Top

#1 This little essay attempts to find something new in an old and dirty pile of poop.

The West colonized much of the world because much of the world was much as it is now, only without the modern weaponry. Islam has been at war with the West since its invention. North Africa was infested by pirates, most of it ruled by mostly autonomous Ottoman beys. The Ottoman rule of much of the Middle East was in its last stages of corruption and decadence. Subsaharan Africa was inhabited by primitives; they still occasionally eat a few pygmies, and much of the continent is still ruled by kleptomaniac dictators, not much of an improvement over tribal chieftains. India was split among Moslem and Hindu princelings who spent a good deal of their time plotting, planning, and oppressing each other -- notice that Pakistain grew out of it, and still maintains much the same relationship with India. China's Ching dynasty was in the final stages of decadent collapse and large area were ruled by warlords. That's not to say the West was blameless; recall the Belgian Congo, German Namibia, and Italian rule in the Horn of Africa. Recall Spanish rule most places. But it's to say that the natives weren't blameless. Those who were savages weren't in the least noble.

What all those places shared was a misplaced arrogance combined with a healthy dose of dynastic incompetence. (Darkest Africa may have lacked the arrogance; I don't know.) Military interventions in the early stages of the Age of Imperialism were mostly a matter of self defense. Once the precedent was set, of course, conquering the primitives became an end in itself. The aborigines needed the benefits of civilization.

There are post-colonial success stories today, but I can remember being told to think of the starving children in India so I'd eat my supper. That was within living memory since I'm not dead yet. My childhood playmates' fathers had fought the Japanese. I can remember the Great Cultural Revolution in China. That was even more recent.

China, Japan, South Korea, and India -- the success stories of post-colonialism -- today are closer to the West in outlook than are most of the inhabitants of the Moslem world, while still retaining their distinctive national identities. The Moslem world retains its ummah outlook and if it weren't for oil they'd still be either riding camels and waving scimitars or they'd be ruled by Ottomans, with potential rivals to the Sultan getting strangled with a bowstring.
Posted by Fred 2017-02-05 16:29||   2017-02-05 16:29|| Front Page Top

#2 Nailed it Fred.
Posted by 3dc 2017-02-05 17:36||   2017-02-05 17:36|| Front Page Top

#3 #1 - you need a Like button
Posted by Frank G 2017-02-05 19:03||   2017-02-05 19:03|| Front Page Top

23:47 Crusader
21:38 lord garth
20:07 Seeking cure for ignorance
19:07 Rambler in Virginia
19:03 Frank G
18:37 Lone Ranger
18:17 Bhoot
18:13 trailing wife
17:36 3dc
17:35 Blossom Unains5562
17:32 Shipman
17:31 3dc
17:05 Mike Kozlowski
16:43 Blossom Unains5562
16:29 Fred
16:07 rjschwarz
16:06 rjschwarz
15:33 Zenobia Floger6220
15:28 Zenobia Floger6220
15:24 g(r)omgoru
15:13 Abu Uluque
15:11 Abu Uluque
15:09 Abu Uluque
15:06 Bobby









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com