Article

2017-02-07 Home Front: Politix

McConnell: No Federal Money for Investigating Voter Fraud

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Iblis 2017-02-07 00:00|| || Front Page|| [2 views ] Top

#1 California, Oregon, and Washington will never investigate Voter Fraud if left to their own devices. They have to protect their phoney-baloney jobs at all costs.

Posted by CrazyFool 2017-02-07 00:16|| 2017-02-07 00:16|| Front Page Top

#2 If it's a matter best left to the states, then the federal government ought to get out of the way.

Posted by gorb 2017-02-07 00:50|| 2017-02-07 00:50|| Front Page Top

#3 You can't be a crazy fool if you quote Blazing Saddles.
To me, you are perfectly sane.

Posted by newc 2017-02-07 01:07|| 2017-02-07 01:07|| Front Page Top

#4 States are in charge of their own elections.

Posted by newc 2017-02-07 01:08|| 2017-02-07 01:08|| Front Page Top

#5 Until 2013 the Federal Government was in de-facto charge of elections in southern, which were predominately Democrat, states. In June 2013, in a ~~huge blow to democracy~~ perfectly rational decision, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the coverage formula used for Section 5 of the VRA, which required jurisdictions with significant histories of voter discrimination to “pre-clear” any new voting practices or procedures, i.e., get federal approval from the Department of Justice, and show that they do not have a discriminatory purpose or effect.
Importantly, however, the 5-4 decision did not strike down Section 5 itself, leaving it to Congress to devise a new coverage formula. The ACLU is working with Congress to do just that.

Posted by Deacon Blues 2017-02-07 07:41|| 2017-02-07 07:41|| Front Page Top

#6 A perfect example of the "Inner Party" mentality.

Posted by AlanC 2017-02-07 08:32|| 2017-02-07 08:32|| Front Page Top

#7 No Money? Where did Obama find the millions/billions to bless the UN, Paleos, et al?

"there's no evidence that occurred in such a significant number that it would have changed the presidential election."

Oh, what about Senate (re:MN) and house races old man?

Posted by Procopius2k 2017-02-07 09:07|| 2017-02-07 09:07|| Front Page Top

#8 Are we sure McConnell didn't get any Soros money?

Posted by rjschwarz 2017-02-07 10:29|| 2017-02-07 10:29|| Front Page Top

"there's no evidence that occurred in such a significant number that it would have changed the presidential election."

"If they don't look, they can't find what we deny exists, so we'll prevent them from looking..."

Posted by ptah 2017-02-07 11:12|| 2017-02-07 11:12|| Front Page Top

#10 He's gonna leave it the Gov. Moonbeam to tighten the voter rolls in California? The man is a fool.

Posted by Abu Uluque 2017-02-07 11:25|| 2017-02-07 11:25|| Front Page Top

#11 More likely the esteemed Senator from Kentucky is concerned that it might also extend into his home state.

Posted by Pappy 2017-02-07 14:11|| 2017-02-07 14:11|| Front Page Top

#12 The thing is, even if it didn't change the Presidential election it might very well have changed a number of Congressional districts and should be investigated.

Posted by rjschwarz 2017-02-07 16:05|| 2017-02-07 16:05|| Front Page Top

#13 Fuck him.

Posted by Crusader 2017-02-07 23:52|| 2017-02-07 23:52|| Front Page Top

23:52 Crusader
23:50 Crusader
23:45 Crusader
23:29 james
22:54 Grins Snese4215
22:33 CrazyFool
22:26 CrazyFool
22:12 Mullah Richard
22:03 Bangkok Billy
21:55 Procopius2k
21:51 Procopius2k
21:46 Procopius2k
21:42 Procopius2k
21:38 newc
21:22 DarthVader
20:34 Anguper Hupomosing9418
20:11 Crusader
19:06 Silentbrick
18:58 Rex Mundi
18:56 swksvolFF
18:39 ed in texas
18:29 ed in texas
18:27 Seeking cure for ignorance
18:25 Frank G