Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 02/25/2017 View Fri 02/24/2017 View Thu 02/23/2017 View Wed 02/22/2017 View Tue 02/21/2017 View Mon 02/20/2017 View Sun 02/19/2017
1
2017-02-25 -Lurid Crime Tales-
Texas Gov. Wants to Criminally Prosecute Officials Who Adopt Sanctuary City Policies
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2017-02-25 01:08|| || Front Page|| [336093 views ]  Top

#1 YES!!!
Posted by DarthVader 2017-02-25 01:34||   2017-02-25 01:34|| Front Page Top

#2 Abbott confirmed that statement, and said officials, including sheriffs, could "wind up in jail, the place where they are releasing dangerous criminals from."
Posted by Beldar Hupeper7710 2017-02-25 01:55||   2017-02-25 01:55|| Front Page Top

#3 Felony Perjury... Did you swear to uphold the law when sworn in (Y/N)? Case closed.
Posted by magpie 2017-02-25 02:20||   2017-02-25 02:20|| Front Page Top

#4 "When Adam delved, and Eve span - who was then the gentleman?"
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2017-02-25 04:06||   2017-02-25 04:06|| Front Page Top

#5 Why, just remove their 'immunity of office' when they act in conflict with laws of the state and nation, under aiding and abetting. An illegal kills, assaults, rapes while given protection in a sanctuary city, allow the families to sue the officials who created the environment that attracted the perps. Win a couple of those and the problem will disappear over night.
Posted by Procopius2k 2017-02-25 08:50||   2017-02-25 08:50|| Front Page Top

#6 Intrastate bullying.
Let's see suspension of interstate commerce.
Then we'll know he means it.
Posted by Skidmark 2017-02-25 09:44||   2017-02-25 09:44|| Front Page Top

#7 We need a federal law for states like California. I'd love to see Moonbeam surrounded by federal marshals doing the perp walk.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2017-02-25 13:14||   2017-02-25 13:14|| Front Page Top

#8 I am curious, since they claim they are not required to enforce federal immigration laws, are they also immune from the enforcement of any federal law that isn't mirrored in their state of local jurisdiction? Surely there is some precedent for concurrent jurisdiction when a witness to direct violation of federal law (illegal alien status, or perhaps illegal documentation like fraudulent SS numbers, benefit/healthcare use)?
Posted by NoMoreBS 2017-02-25 13:34||   2017-02-25 13:34|| Front Page Top

#9 Do we want to win? This is how we win
Posted by Rex Mundi 2017-02-25 16:36||   2017-02-25 16:36|| Front Page Top

#10 #4 "When Adam delved, and Eve span - who was then the gentleman?"

The hare saw a tomcat. "I'll grab it!"
She bare him (the hussy!) a cabbit.
If Bob wears a habit
And drags it in drabbit,
Then why can't a Bess be an abbot?
Posted by Zenobia Floger6220 2017-02-25 21:48||   2017-02-25 21:48|| Front Page Top

22:56 anon1
22:45 anon1
22:42 anon1
22:10 Zenobia Floger6220
21:59 chris
21:56 Zenobia Floger6220
21:48 Zenobia Floger6220
21:45 Whiskey Mike
21:44 Whiskey Mike
21:40 Sock Puppet of Doom
21:37 Sock Puppet of Doom
21:33 Sock Puppet of Doom
21:27 Zenobia Floger6220
21:10 Canuckistan sniper
21:06 gorb
21:00 Canuckistan sniper
20:58 gorb
20:53 Canuckistan sniper
20:50 Whiskey Mike
20:40 Zenobia Floger6220
20:35 Spike Sproing7930
20:35 Zenobia Floger6220
20:35 Flolung Unolutch1828
20:31 Zenobia Floger6220









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com