Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 03/02/2017 View Wed 03/01/2017 View Tue 02/28/2017 View Mon 02/27/2017 View Sun 02/26/2017 View Sat 02/25/2017 View Fri 02/24/2017
1
2017-03-02 Science
Obumbles underfunded fusion research - but fusion (NOT solar) is the future
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by anon1 2017-03-02 00:00|| || Front Page|| [2 views ]  Top

#1 Don't forget
Lockheed Martin Compact Fusion Reactor
Posted by Chuck 2017-03-02 03:22||   2017-03-02 03:22|| Front Page Top

#2 Don't forget
Lockheed Martin Compact Fusion Reactor


Memory lapse will likely result in contract cost overruns.
Posted by Besoeker 2017-03-02 04:08||   2017-03-02 04:08|| Front Page Top

#3 News flash.
Scientific (and technological) advances are not made by smoothly functioning teams of well adjusted people who are superb communicators and all around likable and were straight-A students. It's made by socially inept --- or straight out antisocial --- supremely egocentric loners, who prefer to spend time inside their heads pursuing their idiosyncratic interests and not giving a f*ck about what other people define as important. Nowadays people like this play computer games --- or, at best, write them.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2017-03-02 05:17||   2017-03-02 05:17|| Front Page Top

#4 wow everyone this is the one i tried to post yesterday and it disappeared - but like magic here it is!!
Posted by anon1 2017-03-02 07:47||   2017-03-02 07:47|| Front Page Top

#5 grom you're so right!!

ps: MIT have a good program for an ARC, or a mini tokomak, which they can do a lot easier than ITER because they use superconductive magnets that work at high temperatures

This talk by Zach Hartwig goes through all the different Fusion permutations and then explains why none are close except for ITER and stellerator

and mini-tokomacs

this is the great talk here, worth a watch:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0KuAx1COEk

basically all research is sort of stalled about 1990-ish
Posted by anon1 2017-03-02 07:50||   2017-03-02 07:50|| Front Page Top

#6 basically all research is sort of stalled about 1990-ish

And when you say all, it's not just fusion - it's everything from animal behavior to origins of the universe - because, conform or die.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2017-03-02 08:10||   2017-03-02 08:10|| Front Page Top

#7 basically all research is sort of stalled about 1990-ish

And when you say all, it's not just fusion - it's everything from animal behavior to origins of the universe - because, conform or die.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2017-03-02 08:10||   2017-03-02 08:10|| Front Page Top

#8 Ooops. I guess I'm so mad, my hands are shaking.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2017-03-02 08:11||   2017-03-02 08:11|| Front Page Top

#9  What happened to the Lockheed Fusion Reactor?
Short answer - work still proceeding well.
Posted by 3dc 2017-03-02 08:17||   2017-03-02 08:17|| Front Page Top

#10 thorium fission is also 'just a decade or two away' situation

so is small modular uranium fission

only a finite amount of research $$ and a finite amount of research scientists
Posted by lord garth 2017-03-02 08:58||   2017-03-02 08:58|| Front Page Top

#11 wow everyone this is the one i tried to post yesterday and it disappeared - but like magic here it is!!

When articles are posted after 2 p.m. ET we prefer to move them to the next day unless they are unfolding terror attacks, anon1. This is not one of those. If you want to add it to an on-going discussion, better to paste it into a comment than post as a separate article.
Posted by trailing wife 2017-03-02 10:29||   2017-03-02 10:29|| Front Page Top

#12 Re: #3

A good example of this is when a committee got together to design a horse, they ended up way over budget and resulted in the end product being a camel.

So when I read about the Lockheed Fusion Reactor, my first thought is that it will never see the light of day. Lockheed being Lockheed, it's purely a money suck designed to bring bonuses to the board and upper management, nothing more.
Posted by Seeking cure for ignorance 2017-03-02 15:54||   2017-03-02 15:54|| Front Page Top

#13 Fusion sounds too much like Fission and actual clean power means people can make bad choices instead instead of cutting back on consumption and returning to a medieval level where they can be controlled.

Spending money on green industries owned by the political connected and talking how we are doing something is much more politically satisfying.
Posted by rjschwarz 2017-03-02 16:52||   2017-03-02 16:52|| Front Page Top

#14 Fusion has already been done, to wit:

Mr Fusion
Posted by Alaska Paul 2017-03-02 18:15||   2017-03-02 18:15|| Front Page Top

#15 I think you overstate for effect, grom. I can think of a few exceptions. And some problems are so hard that you need a team, and not just in experiments.
Posted by james  2017-03-02 21:04|| http://idontknowbut.blogspot.com  2017-03-02 21:04|| Front Page Top

23:47 Pholurt Uloluling1696
23:41 Pholurt Uloluling1696
22:38 Hupineper Smith2347
22:33 Seeking cure for ignorance
22:18 rammer
22:14 Barbara
21:15 Eohippus Cheamp5121
21:04 james
20:47 Sock Puppet of Doom
20:43 Frank G
20:39 trailing wife
20:35 Sock Puppet of Doom
20:33 Sock Puppet of Doom
20:27 james
20:23 Crusader
20:22 Sock Puppet of Doom
20:10 Raj
20:08 Raj
20:05 Raj
19:55 Blossom Unains5562
19:55 Crusader
19:52 3dc
19:19 Crinegum Ulaigum2776
19:17 Crinegum Ulaigum2776









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com