Article

2017-04-03 -Lurid Crime Tales-

Atlanta bridge fire suspect was smoking crack before blaze began

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2017-04-03 00:00|| || Front Page|| [8 views ] Top

#1 While it's fun to read, I refuse to believe hobos, winos, homeless and crackhead flotsam are the cause. They are just convenient dupes.

Much like delivery trucks and crowds, expect to see casual acts of arson against critical infrastructure increasing in number.

Posted by Skidmark 2017-04-03 08:01|| 2017-04-03 08:01|| Front Page Top

#2 No reason it could't be both.

Posted by Besoeker 2017-04-03 08:09|| 2017-04-03 08:09|| Front Page Top

#3 smoking crack wasn't the cause of the fire

Eleby intentionally set a chair on fire; the chair was near a stockpile of polyethylene pipe which in turn caught fire

Posted by lord garth 2017-04-03 08:48|| 2017-04-03 08:48|| Front Page Top

#4 But the government said nothing flammable was stored under the bridge! I guess they lied.
"McMurry said his department stored coils of plastic conduit, used in fiber optic networks, beneath the span but insisted they were noncombustible."

Posted by Glenmore 2017-04-03 09:43|| 2017-04-03 09:43|| Front Page Top

#5 There are different definitions of non-combustible. I'll bet the department was using a very lax one, suitable for conduit that was going to be buried.

Posted by James 2017-04-03 09:51|| http://www.idontknowbut.blogspot.com 2017-04-03 09:51|| Front Page Top

#6 About 20 years ago, I reconstructed a semi-crash on the interstate. The semi was hauling plastic beads that were used in some process. The semi hit a van, an SUV and another semi killing several people. Diesel fuel was spread over the highway. The diesel fuel ignited and scorched the surface of the divider and roadway but little other damage was done to the highway. The plastic beads did not seem to contribute to the fire. I find it difficult to believe so much damage could be done on I-85 by plastic conduit catching fire underneath the highway. Could be that thermite caused the fire which would put this into terrorism consideration. Concrete doesn't usually burn and steel (assuming steel supports or I-beams were used) melts at a high temperature.

Posted by JohnQC 2017-04-03 10:48|| 2017-04-03 10:48|| Front Page Top

#7 John Q steel doesn't have to melt. It only has to get hot enough to fail.

Posted by Deacon Blues 2017-04-03 13:09|| 2017-04-03 13:09|| Front Page Top

#8 The PVC duct was rolled on spools (possibly plastic) and stacked up, therefore concentrating any heat produced by the burning duct.

Kept it burning longer, too.

If anyone is interested, check out 2123 Piedmont Rd NE, Atlanta, Ga. or Google Street View

Posted by Mullah Richard 2017-04-03 13:53|| 2017-04-03 13:53|| Front Page Top

#9 It appears the plastics used to coat fibre optic cables are flammable.

Posted by phil_b 2017-04-03 20:06|| 2017-04-03 20:06|| Front Page Top

22:59 Zenobia Floger6220
22:42 Tyranysaurus Cholush1274
22:37 rjschwarz
22:27 Frank G
21:32 Zenobia Floger6220
21:21 charger
21:19 charger
21:18 charger
21:17 charger
20:14 phil_b
20:13 trailing wife
20:12 CrazyFool
20:06 phil_b
19:44 Glenmore
19:43 Bangkok Billy
19:40 Whavish Thusoling5684
19:33 phil_b
19:29 Lone Ranger
19:20 Jack Salami
19:09 Zenobia Floger6220
18:59 rjschwarz
18:50 Ho Chi Spusing4267
18:25 Raj
18:14 Glenmore