Article

2017-04-05 -Short Attention Span Theater-

Elizabeth Warren paid female staffers 71% of male staffers’ salaries

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2017-04-05 00:00|| || Front Page|| [2 views ] Top

#1 But gave them all the moccasin leather they could chew.

Posted by Skidmark 2017-04-05 00:22|| 2017-04-05 00:22|| Front Page Top

#2 was more than $20,000 less

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2017-04-05 05:04|| 2017-04-05 05:04|| Front Page Top

#3 "at least it wasn't a smallpox blanket"

Posted by Frank G 2017-04-05 07:42|| 2017-04-05 07:42|| Front Page Top

#4 Did they take into account 'educational achievement'?

Posted by Pappy 2017-04-05 08:30|| 2017-04-05 08:30|| Front Page Top

#5 One set of rules for thee, another set of rules for me.

Posted by Procopius2k 2017-04-05 09:21|| 2017-04-05 09:21|| Front Page Top

#6 Did they take into account 'educational achievement'?

That is no longer the determination for 'opportunity' or 'pay' in many folks' minds, Pappy.

'Experience' gets the short-shrift too.

Posted by Mullah Richard 2017-04-05 09:56|| 2017-04-05 09:56|| Front Page Top

#7 No equal wampum for equal work? What happened to the cultural war being waged on the left?

Posted by JohnQC 2017-04-05 10:41|| 2017-04-05 10:41|| Front Page Top

#8 That is no longer the determination for 'opportunity' or 'pay' in many folks' minds, Pappy.

I was thinking more along the lines of 'Harvard' versus 'Bay State Community'.

Posted by Pappy 2017-04-05 11:17|| 2017-04-05 11:17|| Front Page Top

#9 But, of course, as a senator she gets equal pay with her male colleagues.

Posted by Abu Uluque 2017-04-05 11:25|| 2017-04-05 11:25|| Front Page Top

#10 #4 Did they take into account 'educational achievement'?

That, along with job experience are what the stats weenies call "confounding variables", things you need to control for or eliminate lest they render your analysis useless.

I'm conflicted here. On one hand, I like the Reverse Alinsky - make them live up to their own rules. On the other, I hate to see BS numbers tossed around. Admittedly, the gravy on top is a chance to mock Fauxahontas.

Posted by SteveS 2017-04-05 19:59|| 2017-04-05 19:59|| Front Page Top

22:45 rjschwarz
22:09 3dc
22:04 charger
22:00 3dc
21:52 Frank G
21:41 Blossom Unains5562
21:37 newc
21:37 Blossom Unains5562
21:26 Blossom Unains5562
21:25 Blossom Unains5562
21:23 Blossom Unains5562
21:19 Blossom Unains5562
20:42 Jack Salami
20:36 DarthVader
20:34 phil_b
20:23 newc
20:11 newc
20:10 phil_b
20:05 Rex Mundi
20:04 phil_b
19:59 SteveS
19:51 SteveS
19:35 phil_b
19:34 Dale