Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 04/05/2017 View Tue 04/04/2017 View Mon 04/03/2017 View Sun 04/02/2017 View Sat 04/01/2017 View Fri 03/31/2017 View Thu 03/30/2017
1
2017-04-05 Government
Susan Rice creates intelligence community surveillance spreadsheets
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2017-04-05 00:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views ]  Top

#1 Spreadsheets hahaha, crosstab pivot tables!
No clever multiedge graph linkage analysis here.
Posted by Skidmark 2017-04-05 00:16||   2017-04-05 00:16|| Front Page Top

#2 SusanRice ordered U.S. spy agencies to produce "detailed spreadsheets" of legal phone calls
So when left-wing stormtroopers show up at a someone's house it is another "unexpected" coincidence?
Posted by magpie 2017-04-05 01:41||   2017-04-05 01:41|| Front Page Top

#3 Koskinen demanded spreadsheets ?
Posted by Besoeker 2017-04-05 07:14||   2017-04-05 07:14|| Front Page Top

#4 Presumably, these "spreadsheets" had a "TO" column and "FROM" column with names of who called whom.

diGenova said. “In short, the only apparent illegal activity was the unmasking of the people in the calls.”--and the dissemination of that info throughout the intelligence community due to Obama's order for later use in creating difficulty for a Trump administration.
Posted by JohnQC 2017-04-05 09:02||   2017-04-05 09:02|| Front Page Top

#5 Aw come on, Rice probably didn't even know Trump was running for president. Pure coincidence.

And it's perfectly legal and ethical, too. The NYT wouldn't complain if the current NSA got a similar spreadsheet on Clinton's contacts with Russia.
Posted by Matt 2017-04-05 09:50||   2017-04-05 09:50|| Front Page Top

#6 So Rice did not prepare the spreadsheets herself, she merely ordered them to be prepared. Not quite the same thing I guess but close enough, isn't it? My biggest problem here is I can't trust Andrea Mitchell to ask the pertinent questions in a case like this. Mitchell will be more interested in framing the interview in a way that makes it sound like Rice is innocent while avoiding the tough questions like this: "Exactly why did you order the unmasking? What was it about these phone calls in which no illegal activities were discussed that was so interesting? Huh?"
Posted by Abu Uluque 2017-04-05 11:35||   2017-04-05 11:35|| Front Page Top

#7 Akin to "I didn't put people in the ovens, I just ordered it?"
Posted by JohnQC 2017-04-05 12:46||   2017-04-05 12:46|| Front Page Top

#8 So Rice did not prepare the spreadsheets herself, she merely ordered them to be prepared.

That's because she doesn't know how to make a spreadsheet. I'm amazed she can read one.

Al
Posted by Frozen Al 2017-04-05 14:33||   2017-04-05 14:33|| Front Page Top

22:45 rjschwarz
22:09 3dc
22:04 charger
22:00 3dc
21:52 Frank G
21:41 Blossom Unains5562
21:37 newc
21:37 Blossom Unains5562
21:26 Blossom Unains5562
21:25 Blossom Unains5562
21:23 Blossom Unains5562
21:19 Blossom Unains5562
20:42 Jack Salami
20:36 DarthVader
20:34 phil_b
20:23 newc
20:11 newc
20:10 phil_b
20:05 Rex Mundi
20:04 phil_b
19:59 SteveS
19:51 SteveS
19:35 phil_b
19:34 Dale









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com