Article

2017-04-06 Home Front: Politix

Trump claims Susan Rice may have committed crime

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2017-04-06 00:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views ] Top

#1 Well, The must be a Prophet because what he says sounds crazy at first and then turns out to be true.

Goodness My!....

The log does not lie. Nor do they deny request for sitting Executive Authority.

When you start un-masking people like that after massive inquiry,
Let me put it this way...

You gone Fishing.

This is police state.
Maxine Waters talking about a private database delivered to the hill where Obama and co-horts have all our information.

WATCH THIS

Posted by newc 2017-04-06 01:53|| 2017-04-06 01:53|| Front Page Top

#2 Is Obama able to be extradited from his holiday bolthole (seems to be there without moochelle)?

Posted by Bright Pebbles 2017-04-06 09:22|| 2017-04-06 09:22|| Front Page Top

#3 Who'd want to extradite him?

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2017-04-06 09:25|| 2017-04-06 09:25|| Front Page Top

#4 Re #2: Yes, the US has an extradition treaty with Fiji.

Posted by Rambler in Virginia 2017-04-06 09:37|| 2017-04-06 09:37|| Front Page Top

#5 Yes, the US has an extradition treaty with Fiji.

Deltas in transit, 3..2..1

Posted by Skidmark 2017-04-06 10:24|| 2017-04-06 10:24|| Front Page Top

#6 Turn it over to AG Jeff Sessions and push on. Sessions needs to follow this whoever is involved and wherever it may go. we've had lawlessness for far too long. There is two systems of justice; one for the little people and a different one for the elites.

Posted by JohnQC 2017-04-06 10:55|| 2017-04-06 10:55|| Front Page Top

#7 I wish Mr. Trump hadn't said this. The evidence is not there yet. But I understand that he has to do this to get the news to cover the story, so the people who have the evidence hear that what they know is important. Necessary, I guess, but so irritating to watch.

Posted by rammer 2017-04-06 13:14|| 2017-04-06 13:14|| Front Page Top

#8 From what I read, as far as we know at this point: * What Rice did was legal, but unethical.
* What Obama did to allow intelligence agencies to spread stuff far and wide was legal, but unethical.
* If there was collision between those two decisions (If Rice was acting under orders) then the combo would be illegal tampering into an election. If the orders were verbal and unrecorded (as seems likely) we'll never get to the bottom of it.

Posted by rjschwarz 2017-04-06 16:46|| 2017-04-06 16:46|| Front Page Top

23:26 alpha2c
22:46 USN, Ret.
22:28 SteveS
22:26 SteveS
22:23 Fred
22:18 charger
21:43 Frank G
21:42 Sock Puppet of Doom
21:42 Frank G
21:39 Zenobia Floger6220
21:39 Sock Puppet of Doom
21:36 Sock Puppet of Doom
21:24 Zenobia Floger6220
20:57 rjschwarz
20:55 rjschwarz
20:52 rjschwarz
20:49 rjschwarz
20:42 Victor Emmanuel Johnson5588
20:39 SteveS
20:03 Crusader
19:40 Frank G
19:39 Frank G
19:21 Menhadden Johnson6615
19:13 AlanC