Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 08/10/2017 View Wed 08/09/2017 View Tue 08/08/2017 View Mon 08/07/2017 View Sun 08/06/2017 View Sat 08/05/2017 View Fri 08/04/2017
1
2017-08-10 -Short Attention Span Theater-
With 'fire and fury,' Trump revives fears about his possession of nuclear codes
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Seeking cure for ignorance 2017-08-10 03:54|| || Front Page|| [5 views ]  Top

#1 Leftard mental processes in all their glory.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2017-08-10 04:19||   2017-08-10 04:19|| Front Page Top

#2 I simply can't see the USA going nuclear first. There will be no need for starters.
Posted by phil_b 2017-08-10 05:59||   2017-08-10 05:59|| Front Page Top

#3 Actually, voters showed they preferred Trump in control of the nukes by putting him into office.
Posted by Rob Crawford 2017-08-10 07:41||   2017-08-10 07:41|| Front Page Top

#4 My initial feelings about Trump have been pretty much borne out, he is bombastic. But, his verbiage, while pointing the way he wants to go, does not show the deliberation and pace with which he will move.

The best line of the campaign time frame was: his supporters take him seriously not literally, his critics the other way.
Posted by AlanC 2017-08-10 07:49||   2017-08-10 07:49|| Front Page Top

#5 #2 Didn't stop us in 1945. Same rationale, save more lives than a direct assault (military and civilian) and changed the thinking of those around the decision makers of the enemy altering who exercised the power.
Posted by Procopius2k 2017-08-10 09:33||   2017-08-10 09:33|| Front Page Top

#6 Trump's bombast has succeeded in putting the prospect of the US use of nukes back in play, which should have at least some deterrent effect on war. There is no point having nukes if everyone knows you would never use them.
Posted by Glenmore 2017-08-10 10:43||   2017-08-10 10:43|| Front Page Top

#7 My initial feelings about Trump have been pretty much borne out, he is bombastic

I think of him as matador - except the left are more rats than bulls.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2017-08-10 10:44||   2017-08-10 10:44|| Front Page Top

#8 The US has huge amounts of Stealth technology. Terminators can have an M16 in fat boys face before he can clear the sleep out of his eyes. The key is to take him alive if possible back to Guam. Cover launch and development areas with hell fire drones. Strike anything that so much as moves an onch. If a nuke goes off during a strike it is localized. Continue stealth strikes until capitulation.
Posted by Threatch Jeamp8135 2017-08-10 11:01||   2017-08-10 11:01|| Front Page Top

#9 Sounds Truman'esque to me, No?

He has got this, and what he foes not, I have.

Posted by newc 2017-08-10 11:52||   2017-08-10 11:52|| Front Page Top

#10 Candidate Hillary Clinton on Iran:
"I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran (if it attacks Israel)," Clinton said in an interview on ABC's "Good Morning America."

"In the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them," she said.

Candidate John Kerry on WMD threats:
We must ensure that lawless states and terrorists will not be armed with weapons of mass destruction.

This is the single gravest threat to our security. Any potential adversary should know that we will defend ourselves against the possibility of attack by unconventional arms. If such a strike does occur, as commander-in-chief, I will respond with overwhelming and devastating force. If such an attack appears imminent, as commander-in-chief, I will do whatever is necessary to stop it. And, as commander-in-chief, I will never cede our security to anyone. I will always do what is necessary to safeguard our country.


This was was pretty tough rhetoric. The big problem is that both candidates subsequently worked as Obama's SoS to help Iran acquire nuclear weapons.

So North Korea might reasonably dismiss Trump's and Mattis' threats as empty bluster.

Western deterrence has been eroded over the last decades by Western politician making empty threats.
Posted by Elmerert Hupens2660 2017-08-10 12:52||   2017-08-10 12:52|| Front Page Top

#11 I recall Reagan joking back in the 1980s:

Reagan said “My fellow Americans, I am pleased to tell you today that I’ve signed legislation that will outlaw Russia forever. We begin bombing in five minutes.” The left went ballistic then but when Hillary bombed Libya, not much. You recall the lovely babe, Hilda, who said: "We came, we saw, he died" in reference to Qaddafi.
Posted by JohnQC 2017-08-10 16:01||   2017-08-10 16:01|| Front Page Top

22:44 Procopius2k
22:35 Steven
22:02 Skidmark
21:59 Skidmark
21:19 Zenobia Floger6220
21:13 Zenobia Floger6220
20:46 Ulains Thuque6389
18:41 Threatch Jeamp8135
18:36 swksvolFF
18:34 trailing wife
18:21 trailing wife
18:18 49 Pan
18:11 g(r)omgoru
18:04 Beau
17:41 Besoeker
17:39 Thing From Snowy Mountain
17:38 Thing From Snowy Mountain
17:35 Thing From Snowy Mountain
17:35 Skidmark
17:32 Skidmark
17:29 Skidmark
17:26 Skidmark
17:24 Skidmark
17:19 NoMoreBS









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com