Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 10/04/2017 View Tue 10/03/2017 View Mon 10/02/2017 View Sun 10/01/2017 View Sat 09/30/2017 View Fri 09/29/2017 View Thu 09/28/2017
1
2017-10-04 Afghanistan
General Mattis reveals new rules of engagement
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2017-10-04 02:47|| || Front Page|| [1 views ]  Top

#1 Does he mean compliance with Art.99 of the UCMJ -


899. ARTICLE 99. MISBEHAVIOR BEFORE THE ENEMY
10. Punitive Articles

Any person subject to this chapter who before or in the presence of the enemy–

(1) runs away;

(2) shamefully abandons, surrenders, or delivers up any command, unit, place, or military property which it is his duty to defend;

(3) through disobedience, neglect, or intentional misconduct endangers the safety of any such command, unit, place, or military property;

(4) casts away his arms or ammunition;

(5) is guilty of cowardly conduct;

(6) quits his place of duty to plunder or pillage;

(7) causes false alarms in any command, unit, or place under control of the armed forces;

(8) willfully fails to do his utmost to encounter, engage, capture, or destroy any enemy troops, combatants, vessels, aircraft, or any other thing, which it is his duty so to encounter, engage, capture, or destroy; or

(9) does not afford all practicable relief and assistance to any troops, combatants, vessels, or aircraft of the armed forces belonging to the United States or their allies when engaged in battle;


shall be punished by death or such punishment as a court- martial may direct.


???
Posted by Procopius2k 2017-10-04 07:19||   2017-10-04 07:19|| Front Page Top

#2 /s/ SGT Bo Berglund
Posted by Clem 2017-10-04 07:25||   2017-10-04 07:25|| Front Page Top

#3 Won't have to get three JAGs. two political appointees, and the Ambassador to sign off first?
Posted by Frank G 2017-10-04 08:32||   2017-10-04 08:32|| Front Page Top

#4 So we'll be able to shoot back even if the enemy shoots but misses?
Posted by Rambler in Virginia  2017-10-04 08:47||   2017-10-04 08:47|| Front Page Top

#5 Won't have to get three JAGs. two political appointees, and the Ambassador to sign off first?

Not to worry - there's a certain R'Burg commenter who posts chapter and verse of the UCMJ.
Posted by Pappy 2017-10-04 08:53||   2017-10-04 08:53|| Front Page Top

23:56 Skidmark
23:51 Skidmark
23:48 Skidmark
23:35 Skidmark
23:31 newc
23:12 49 Pan
23:10 49 Pan
22:54 newc
22:50 newc
22:46 trailing wife
22:45 newc
22:44 trailing wife
22:40 swksvolFF
22:39 Joluth Thusoting4606
22:30 trailing wife
22:22 swksvolFF
22:21 swksvolFF
22:19 swksvolFF
21:46 Besoeker
21:33 si vis pacem, para bellum
21:27 newc
21:25 newc
21:10 Seeking cure for ignorance
21:07 phil_b









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com