Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 05/20/2024 View Sun 05/19/2024 View Sat 05/18/2024 View Fri 05/17/2024 View Thu 05/16/2024 View Wed 05/15/2024 View Tue 05/14/2024
2023-03-28 -Lurid Crime Tales-
SCOTUS Declines To Hear Case Of Trial Lawyer Who Bribed Judge To Bilk US Oil Company For Billions
[DAILYCALLER] The Supreme Court declined Monday to hear the appeal of a trial lawyer who was convicted after he secured a $9.5 billion judgment against Chevron in Ecuadorian court by bribing the judge.

After Chevron sued Donziger in U.S. courts, U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan found his victory was "obtained by corrupt means," citing in his 2014 opinion the fact that Donziger had bribed the judge and ghostwritten both the environmental report and the court opinion. In 2021, Donziger was convicted on civil contempt of court charges after failing to hand over his electronics to Chevron’s forensic experts, a conviction he appealed on separation of powers grounds, according to Rooters.

When Kaplan initially charged Donziger in 2019, the U.S. attorney in Manhattan declined to prosecute the charges due to lack of resources, prompting Kaplan to appoint private lawyers, Rooters reported. Donzinger, who ultimately spent 45 days in prison and 993 days on house arrest, argues that the court-appointed private prosecutors violate the separation of powers because they were operating without executive oversight.

After the Second Circuit upheld his conviction, Donzinger petitioned the Supreme Court to grant certiorari in September, which the Supreme Court denied on Monday.

Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh issued a dissenting opinion, arguing that the case “broke a basic constitutional promise.” One branch cannot install “nonofficer employees” for another, they wrote.

“However much the district court may have thought Mr. Donziger warranted punishment, the prosecution in this case broke a basic constitutional promise essential to our liberty,” they wrote. “In this country, judges have no more power to initiate a prosecution of those who come before them than prosecutors have to sit in judgment of those they charge. … Our Constitution does not tolerate what happened here.”
Posted by Fred 2023-03-28 00:00|| || Front Page|| [15 views ]  Top

#1 I agree with the dissent. Not sure why the court went Emmitt Sullivan in this instance.
Posted by Super Hose 2023-03-28 12:18||   2023-03-28 12:18|| Front Page Top

02:03 Fred
01:56 Grom the reflective
01:54 Remoteman
01:41 Grom the reflective
01:39 Grom the reflective
01:36 Grom the reflective
01:33 Grom the reflective
01:31 Grom the reflective
01:29 Grom the reflective
01:14 Angealing+B.+Hayes4677
01:03 Grom the reflective
00:34 DarthVader
00:31 Nero
00:16 Angealing+B.+Hayes4677
00:14 Angealing+B.+Hayes4677









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com