Hi there, !
Today Mon 04/04/2011 Sun 04/03/2011 Sat 04/02/2011 Fri 04/01/2011 Thu 03/31/2011 Wed 03/30/2011 Tue 03/29/2011 Archives
Rantburg Britain
558935 articles and 1927347 comments are archived on Rantburg.

Today: 76 articles and 230 comments as of 4:41.
Post a news link    Post your own article   
Area: WoT Background    Non-WoT    Opinion        Politix   
Two UN staff beheaded and eight others murdered in protest against U.S. pastor who burnt Koran
Today's Headlines
Headline Comments [Views]
Page 2: WoT Background
4 00:00 Rob Crawford [11134]
4 00:00 trailing wife [11137]
Page 3: Non-WoT
0 [11135]
0 [11139]
Page 4: Opinion
12 00:00 Jock the Salmon [11140]
Britain
Why weren't the Obamas invited to the Royal Wedding?

Continued on Page 47
Posted by: tipper || 04/01/2011 15:42 || Comments || Link || [11140 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Turn the question around. Why would you want to invite the Obamas?

I wouldn't even want them at my patio barbecue.
Posted by: Water Modem || 04/01/2011 15:53 Comments || Top||

#2  They give crappy gifts?
Posted by: Secret Master || 04/01/2011 15:57 Comments || Top||

#3  The prince already has an ipod? And will have better things to do at night than listen to Obama's greatest speeches....
Posted by: CrazyFool || 04/01/2011 16:14 Comments || Top||

#4  Michelle Obama even said a few weeks ago on "Live With Regis and Kelly" that, "if I get invited, I'll go," as close to begging as this regal First Lady gets

*gag*

really? That nagging hypocritical wookie in clown clothes and boob belts? Regal?
Posted by: Frank G || 04/01/2011 16:21 Comments || Top||

#5  Because Her Majesty has class.
Posted by: Rob Crawford || 04/01/2011 16:42 Comments || Top||

#6  Michelle Zerobama gives these nasty friendly pats on the back. Elisabeth II is still bruised.
Posted by: twobyfour || 04/01/2011 17:09 Comments || Top||

#7  They give crappy gifts? Really crappy gifts! What can they give? They already gave the box set of BO's speeches.
Posted by: JohnQC || 04/01/2011 17:27 Comments || Top||

#8  Why weren't the Obamas invited to the Royal Wedding?

Prince William is merely third in line to the throne, not the heir, so this is not a state affair. Therefore only friends and family are invited, not heads of state. It is unseemly to be fussing over such things, especially when Mrs. Obama's husband has made it clear he loathes the British ruling class for the sins of their fathers against his.
Posted by: trailing wife || 04/01/2011 18:39 Comments || Top||

#9  What can they give?

Used underwear, like Bill Clinton.

Therefore only friends and family are invited, not heads of state.

http://www.montrealgazette.com/story_print.html?id=4315992
Then there will be 200 members of government, parliament and the diplomatic corps, as well as 60 governors-general and prime ministers from Commonwealth countries, and 30 members of the British military.

Hey, didn't America once have a king with a last name suspiciously like the one in Britain? And Kenya too.
Posted by: Zebulon Thranter9685 || 04/01/2011 18:59 Comments || Top||

#10  Because William had made it clear who was NOT invited to his wedding to the rest of the Royal Family.
Posted by: Shieldwolf || 04/01/2011 19:13 Comments || Top||

#11  Really, can you note a better effort at leadership legitimacy for the House of Windsor than denying the pompous Prince of British Hate a soapbox?
Posted by: Frank G || 04/01/2011 20:54 Comments || Top||

#12  Because they are the kind of people who are crass enough to ask.
Posted by: Jock the Salmon || 04/01/2011 21:11 Comments || Top||


Choudary threatens royal wedding
Anjem Choudary has threatened that a terror attack is 'highly likely' at the royal wedding. He told all Muslims to stay away from Westminster Abbey on April 29, describing it as 'a prime target'.

Choudary has also been haranguing followers of the hate group, Muslims Against Crusades, and is backing its plan for a 'forceful demonstration' at the wedding.

"All Muslims should stay away from the public gatherings like the royal wedding and the Olympics because there is a very high likelihood of an attack. Prime targets most probably would be public gatherings like that, so I think Muslims in general should stay away to avoid injury," said Choudary.

"Maybe when the priest says "is there anyone who objects to this wedding speak now or forever hold your tongue" - who knows what will happen at that time? If my brothers decide to use the opportunity when the world is looking at the Royal Family to pass a message so that we can avoid more deaths of innocent men, women and children in Afghanistan, that should be applauded.

"Prince William has been on military duty in Afghanistan, as well as his brother. I believe that the Queen and her children are supportive of the war in Afghanistan, which translates to us as a war against Muslims."

He also said: "We believe this is complete murder and mayhem that they have orchestrated. We will stand against and expose anyone who supports that.Security services in this country will tell you there is very high risk (of a terror attack). That is their main concern about the wedding."

Choudary became leader of Islam4UK but it was banned last year by the Terrorism Act 2000. Now another group has emerged in its place and Choudary admits he is involved.

The group has created a website with a clock counting down to the royal wedding, calling the royal family 'enemies to Allah and his messenger'.

Choudhary says the protest could include hardliners from the group setting fire to Union Jack flags.

"It's not illegal in this country to burn a Union Jack. There may be placards and people addressing the crowd. A lot of them are former students of mine. Also they were previously with al-Muhajiroun so I do know them. I'm not their spokesman but they invite me from time to time."
Continued on Page 47
Posted by: ryuge || 04/01/2011 10:58 || Comments || Link || [11134 views] Top|| File under:

#1  But that's Prince Charles's kid. Why would Muslims act against his offspring, when he's on their side?
Posted by: trailing wife || 04/01/2011 12:35 Comments || Top||

#2  These people need a serious whacking. Their delusions of adequacy are beginning to irritate me greatly. Breaking kneecaps is no longer enough - go for the neck.

As a celebration of the Prince's wedding, let's hang 40 of them from Tower Bridge!
Posted by: Old Patriot || 04/01/2011 12:52 Comments || Top||

#3  What a dipshit.
Posted by: Fi || 04/01/2011 13:06 Comments || Top||

#4  OP -- I'm pretty sure the Tower Bridge has more capacity than 40.
Posted by: Rob Crawford || 04/01/2011 16:44 Comments || Top||


British press celebrates April Fools' Day

Continued on Page 47
Posted by: ryuge || 04/01/2011 10:57 || Comments || Link || [11135 views] Top|| File under:


No immunity for Libyan minister: UK
[Arab News] Britain refused Thursday to offer Libyan Foreign Minister Moussa Koussa immunity from prosecution after his apparent defection, but said his departure would hearten rebels fighting to topple Muammar Qadaffy's regime.

British Foreign Secretary William Hague said the resignation of Koussa, one of the most senior members of Qadaffy's government, shows that the Libyan leader's regime is "fragmented, under pressure and crumbling." But Hague said "Koussa is not being offered any immunity from British or international justice," dampening speculation that the British government might seek to overlook allegations -- leveled by Libya's opposition -- that he played a pivotal role in the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103, among other atrocities.

"Qadaffy must be thinking to himself, 'Who will be the next to walk away'?" Hague said.

Hague said it wouldn't be "helpful to advertise" whether or not other senior members of the regime planned to quit but that he believes many likely privately opposed Qadaffy's actions.

Authorities debriefed Koussa, a trusted Qadaffy adviser and longtime stalwart in the Libyan regime, after he decamped to Britain on Wednesday on a private plane from Tunisia -- apparently with little notice to the British government.

Hague said Koussa was in a "secure place in the United Kingdom," but did not disclose further details.

The Libyan opposition alleges that Koussa, regarded as one of Qadaffy's closest allies, had a role in criminal masterminding the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, that killed 270 people, most of them Americans.

Koussa was expelled from Britain in 1980 after giving an interview advocating the use of violence to silence UK

critics of Libya's government.

His name also was associated with the bombing of a French aircraft over Niger in 1989, but in recent years he helped with diplomatic progress that ended Libya's international isolation.

Former Foreign Secretary Jack Straw described Koussa as a key player who had a "fundamentally important" role in negotiations to bring Libya back into the international fold in the 1990s after terror attacks tainted the North African country's reputation. Koussa's departure would shift the balance away from Qadaffy, if only psychologically.

"Moussa Koussa's apparent defection -- certainly his unscheduled visit here -- will be a very important factor in just adding to the weight against the Qadaffy regime and tipping the balance against him," Straw told BBC radio.

"From a distance, what's clear is that there is unlikely to be any military 'victory' for either side. So it does depend on which side psychologically collapses." Koussa's move would be the first high-profile resignation since the US -led air strikes on Libyan forces began.

Libya's justice and interior ministers resigned early in the conflict and joined the rebels fighting in the east.

Though Koussa's name was long connected with liquidating dissidents in Western and Arab capitals, he later became instrumental in negotiations with the West that led to the dismantling of Libya's nuclear program.

In 2003, Libya claimed the credit for the Lockerbie bombing and agreed to pay restitution to the victims.

Qadaffy also announced he was dismantling his nuclear weapons program, bringing a major breakthrough in US -Libyan ties. Those steps prompted the United States and Europe to lift sanctions against Libya.

Britain restored diplomatic relations in 1999, ending Libya's international isolation.

Guma El-Gamaty, an organizer in Britain for a leading Libyan opposition group, said Koussa's action would be "a big hit" that would weaken Qadaffy.

"He says he is resigning," El-Gamaty said. "That means he is defecting. He has been Qadaffy's right-hand man for years, running intelligence, running the Lockerbie bomber negotiations, running many things." El-Gamaty said he does not think Koussa is likely to remain in Britain but would probably end up in another country in an effort to avoid possible prosecution.

He said that Koussa would not be welcomed into the opposition movement because of his prior actions on behalf of the Qadaffy government.
Continued on Page 47
Posted by: Fred || 04/01/2011 00:00 || Comments || Link || [11137 views] Top|| File under:

#1  If you people only knew that "kussa" means in arabic.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru || 04/01/2011 12:49 Comments || Top||

#2  If you people only knew that "kussa" means in arabic.

Well? Don't be a tease, g(r)omgoru. But you have to specify whether it's classical Arabic or one of the regional dialects.
Posted by: trailing wife || 04/01/2011 13:52 Comments || Top||

#3  It's not literary Arabic, TW. Rather rude Syrian/Palestinian vernacular. Comes from the root "kus" (vagina). Usually refers to cutting somebody face in a certain manner. That is "I give you a kusa on your face" means "I mark you as my bitch where everybody can see it." Kinda like "I'll reap you a new one." in Anglo-Saxon.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru || 04/01/2011 15:09 Comments || Top||

#4  I'm sure some of our Rantburgers will find that knowledge useful, g(r)omgoru. With luck I'll just be able to enjoy the knowledge. ;-) A small point of information, because you've probably never seen it in writing: it's "I'll rip/tear you a new one."

... You don't suppose that's what Mrs. Clinton was actually communicating to Mrs. Arafat when she kissed her on both cheeks, rather than affected affection?
Posted by: trailing wife || 04/01/2011 18:50 Comments || Top||


UK legislator Jim Devine sent to prison for expense claims
[Dawn] Another member of Britain's House of Commons has been sentenced to prison for making fraudulent expense claims.

Former Labour Party MP Jim Devine was sentenced Thursday to 16 months in prison. He had been convicted of two charges of false accounting for filing bogus invoices for cleaning and printing work totalling more than 8,000 pounds ($13,000).

Two other former Labour politicians have been convicted and sentenced to prison in the scandal of expense claims. John Taylor, a former Conservative member of the House of Lords, is awaiting sentencing after being convicted in February.

A total of 392 current and former politicians were ordered to repay a total of 1.12 million pounds in expenses.
Continued on Page 47
Posted by: Fred || 04/01/2011 00:00 || Comments || Link || [11139 views] Top|| File under:



Who's in the News
63[untagged]
4Govt of Syria
2Jamaat-e-Ulema Islami
1Chechen Republic of Ichkeria
1Govt of Iran
1Govt of Pakistan
1Hamas
1TTP
1al-Qaeda in Arabia
1al-Qaeda in Iraq

Bookmark
E-Mail Me

The Classics
The O Club
Rantburg Store
The Bloids
The Never-ending Story
Thugburg
Gulf War I
The Way We Were
Bio

Merry-Go-Blog











On Sale now!


A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.

Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.

Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has dominated Mexico for six years.
Click here for more information

Meet the Mods
In no particular order...
Steve White
Seafarious
tu3031
badanov
sherry
ryuge
GolfBravoUSMC
Bright Pebbles
trailing wife
Gloria
Fred
Besoeker
Glenmore
Frank G
3dc
Skidmark

Two weeks of WOT
Fri 2011-04-01
  Two UN staff beheaded and eight others murdered in protest against U.S. pastor who burnt Koran
Thu 2011-03-31
  Obama 'orders covert help for Libya rebels'
Wed 2011-03-30
  Libyan Foreign Minister quits, arrives in UK
Tue 2011-03-29
  Yemeni regime loses grip on four provinces
Mon 2011-03-28
  Rebels push towards Sirte
Sun 2011-03-27
  Libyan rebels say forces reach oil town of Brega
Sat 2011-03-26
  Libyan Rebels Reclaim Ajdabiya
Fri 2011-03-25
  Libya: French aircraft destroyed a dozen armored vehicles in 3 days
Thu 2011-03-24
  15 dead in new clashes in Deraa
Wed 2011-03-23
  Qaddafi attacks rebel towns
Tue 2011-03-22
  Western War Planes Hit Qadaffy Command Post
Mon 2011-03-21
  Gaddafi compound attacked again amid reports son killed
Sun 2011-03-20
  Crisis in Libya: U.S. bombs Qaddafi's airfields
Sat 2011-03-19
  Fighting reported near Benghazi - Tanks enter city
Fri 2011-03-18
  Libya declares ceasefire after UN resolution


Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
216.73.216.10
Help keep the Burg running! Paypal:
WoT Background (16)    Non-WoT (16)    Opinion (7)    (0)    Politix (3)