Mrs May uses an interview with The Sunday Telegraph to warn that the Act is hampering the Home Office's struggle to deport dangerous foreign criminals and terrorist suspects.
"I'd personally like to see the Human Rights Act go because I think we have had some problems with it," she says.
The Home Secretary's words will be cheered by many Conservative MPs as well as Tory ministers across Whitehall.
However, they are likely to be greeted with dismay by leading Liberal Democrats, some of whom have signalled the future of the Coalition would be under threat if any serious action was taken against the Act, which incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law.
At last month's Liberal Democrat conference in Birmingham, Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister, was loudly cheered by his party's activists as he declared: "Let me say something really clear about the Human Rights Act. In fact I'll do it in words of one syllable: It is here to stay."
Mrs May says today: "I see it, here in the Home Office, particularly, the sort of problems we have in being unable to deport people who perhaps are terrorist suspects. Obviously we've seen it with some foreign criminals who are in the UK." The Coalition has set up a commission of human rights experts to report on the possibility of bringing in a British Bill of Rights to replace the Act by the end of next year.
Campaigners see the chances of the commission -- which will report to Mr Clegg and Ken Clarke, the Justice Secretary -- recommending any serious changes as negligible, however. There had been widespread belief that it would not recommend the abolition of the Human Rights Act because of the make-up of the panel, which includes pro-rights lawyers, and the determination of the Liberal Democrats to keep the legislation.
But the force and timing of Mrs May's comments, just two weeks after Mr Clegg's declaration, dramatically changes the political landscape.
The Home Office has itself begun a review into the particularly controversial Article 8 of the European Convention, which sets out the right to a "family life" and which campaigners say has been abused by criminals fighting deportation.
In one of the highest-profile cases involving convicts and their human rights claims, a failed asylum seeker who killed 12-year-old Amy Houston, from Blackburn, in a road accident, used the law to avoid deportation.
Other shocking examples uncovered by this newspaper include an Iraqi who killed two doctors but successfully argued that it would breach his rights to send him home.
Activists and MPs will raise a whole host of issues -- including the European Arrest Warrants, which are valid in all member states of the EU and saw 1,000 people in Britain last year seized by police on the orders of European prosecutors, a 51 per cent rise in 12 months.
There will also be anger over last week's threat by the European Commission to take legal action against Britain if ministers do not water down rules limiting foreign nationals' ability to claim benefits. Doing so could potentially cost British taxpayers £2 billion.
Mr Cameron is facing pressure from a new Eurosceptic group of MPs, led by Chris Heaton-Harris, George Eustice and Andrea Leadsom, all members of the party's 2010 general election intake, to recast Britain's relationship with the EU.
Last night Mr Heaton-Harris backed Mrs May's call. He said: "The Act has caused way more damage than good and it is time to stick it in the dustbin."
Continued on Page 47
#2
Here's an idea: Get out of the EU and get your sovereignty back, then kick the bastards out. If you really think you need a "Human Rights Act," pass your own.
There - problem solved. You're welcome.
Posted by: Barbara ||
10/02/2011 13:28 Comments ||
Top||
#3
Suggestion: contact Chowdhury Fazlul Bari, former second-in-command of Rab, for some 'guidance' on how to impact the miscreats causing all the ruckus. (see previous post) There probably is, however, legislation that prohibits exporting of shutter guns, so you will have to improvise.
#4
At some point the Anglo world should get wise and before passing a law they should send the law out to universities with the challenge of finding loopholes and unintended ways the law might be abused. Then loopholes can be shut up and at least the law (no matter how stupid) will act as intended.
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
