You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front
Terrorists aim at Pearl Harbor
2003-03-03
Terrorists linked to al Qaeda have targeted U.S. military facilities in Pearl Harbor, including nuclear-powered submarines and ships, The Washington Times has learned. Intelligence reports about the terrorist threat to the Hawaiian harbor were sent to senior U.S. officials in the past two weeks and coincided with reports of the planning of a major attack by Osama bin Laden's terrorist group. Officials said the reports were one of the reasons that led to the recent heightened security threat alert. The alert status has since been lowered.
Sounds like somebody's imagination's running wild...
According to officials familiar with the reports, al Qaeda is planning an attack on Pearl Harbor because of its symbolic value and because its military facilities are open from the air. The attacks would be carried out by hijacked airliners from nearby Honolulu International Airport that would be flown into submarines or ships docked at Pearl Harbor in suicide missions, said officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
They could also recruit flying monkeys and have them drop pots of boiling oil on our sailors' heads...
In 1995, al Qaeda terrorists were found to have planned a series of attacks using bombs planted on commercial airliners departing from Asia. The plan, known as Project Bojinka, was thwarted by the arrest of one of the plotters in Manila. However, U.S. officials said a key feature of al Qaeda is its determination to carry out unfinished attacks, as the strike on the World Trade Center towers showed. The first attack in 1993 was unsuccessful in knocking down the two skyscrapers.
I'd take this with a large grain of salt. It sounds like barracks-room BS, or Qaeda-kiddies fantasizing on some chat room. And if there's ever another planeload of passengers flown into something, I'll be really surprised...
Posted by:Fred Pruitt

#7  Sounds fishy to me. Why go to all that trouble when there are plenty of high rise hotels near by? I think there's some chain yankin' going on here!
Posted by: Steve   2003-03-03 22:31:49  

#6  I've stood on top of a sub, and watched the airplanes fly overhead (the base is within walking distance from the airport), and been really really frustrated that I couldn't do a damn thing about the helicopter flying right over my damn boat taking pictures.

It could happen.
Posted by: Chap   2003-03-03 21:38:11  

#5  Does anyone else see the irony of choosing Pearl Harbor as a target for its "symbolic value?" Seems to me, the last time we were hit there, we opened up a major can of whoop-ass.
Posted by: Johnny   2003-03-03 21:16:50  

#4  They'd have to catch them in dock, and it's not that easy. Sub movements aren't publicized, anyone hanging around with binoculars wearing a turban and beard might be invited for an extensive Q&A... lol - this is crap - a pipe dream
Posted by: Frank G   2003-03-03 20:18:47  

#3  Of course but would take more flying skills than hitting the WTC
Posted by: True German Ally   2003-03-03 19:20:30  

#2  Submarine as in nuclear submarine? Be an attractive high profile terrorist target if you could grab the plane.
Posted by: john   2003-03-03 18:47:04  

#1  Flying commercial airliners into a submarine? I suppose that takes more than a few flight lessons in Florida...
Posted by: True German Ally   2003-03-03 14:37:39  

00:00