You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Coalition airpower takes on Republican Guard
2003-03-25
From Jane's, nice to read a story written by a professional.
UK and US aircraft are conducting intensive air strikes against a first echelon defence line of the Republican Guard Force Command (RGFC) south of Baghdad.
Allied intelligence has identified the Medina and Al Nida Armoured Divisions south of the Iraqi capital, along with the Baghdad Mechanised Division, preparing to meet units of the US Army's V Corps advancing northwards from Najaf. Other RGFC divisions are believed to be south of Baghdad preparing defensive positions. Early on 24 March, 35-40 AH-64D Apache Longbow attack helicopters from the V Corps' 11th Aviation Brigade launched the first deep-strike mission of the war against an 'engagement zone' containing Republican Guard forces. One Apache was lost after the force met intense Iraqi anti-aircraft fire. It was forced to land and the two-man crew was captured and later shown on Iraqi television.
Yeah. We were just grumbling about that earlier...
Since then fixed-wing aircraft, including US Air Force (USAF) A-10 Thunderbolt IIs and Royal Air Force (RAF) Harrier GR7s, have been pounding Iraqi positions in a series of strikes. The Medina Division has been the focus of Coalition air strikes today, but more targets are emerging and being struck, according to US officers in Qatar.
That's more like it. Ask some of those B52 drivers if they want to stop by, too...
Coalition planners have identified the Republican Guard, the best-trained and equipped component of Saddam's armed forces, as Iraq's 'centre of gravity' and are seeking to defeat it as quickly possible. The 'main effort' in coalition operational plans focused on defeating the Republican Guard rests largely with the US Army's 3rd Infantry Division (Mechanised). Once the RGFC is defeated coalition planners believe that less well-motivated army units will collapse, meaning that costly battles to clear Basra and smaller centres of resistance can be avoided.
"Ummm... How many opposing divisions?" he asked, turning pale...
The first phase of the US battle plan has gone relatively well, with the armoured columns of the 3rd Infantry Division advancing rapidly across 300km of desert from Kuwait. This advance has been relatively unopposed. A major effort has been underway in recent days to 'prepare the battlefield' ahead of the advancing US armoured columns in what military doctrine describes as the 'deep battle'. The Apaches of the 11th Aviation Brigade have been in action, trying to find and destroy Republican Guard tanks in the towns and villages south of Baghdad. Once these efforts to 'find' the main Republican Guard positions have been successful, reconnaissance forces, including attack helicopters, will be sent into action to 'fix' them in their positions while the 3rd Infantry Division's three armoured brigades position themselves to strike.
Where's the part about pounding them to flinders with B52s? I thought that was supposed to come before the helis?
The 'find and fix' phase of the battle is the most crucial for US commanders because they have a numerically inferior force to the Iraqis and have very exposed flanks and supply lines. If US reconnaissance forces and surveillance assets fail to find the Iraqis or misidentify the main Iraqi defensive positions then the US armoured brigades could be committed in the wrong place, exposing them to counter-attack while refuelling or re-arming.
This is known in the trade as being "in deep, deep shit."
The US Army's Apaches will play a key role in hitting 'depth targets' at the same time as the heavy armoured brigades engage the Republican Guard in the 'close battle'. The US aim is to overwhelm their opponents with simultaneous, multiple attacks on the ground, from the front and flanks and in the rear from the air. This unrelenting onslaught is intended to smash through the southern Republican Guard in a matter of a few hours, a day at the longest.
This'd be lessons learned from the Battle of 73 Easting, in GWI...
The strategy of Gen Tommy Franks, Commander US Central Command, is clearly daring and carries high risks. Every kilometre coalition forces advance into Iraq extends the depth of the 'rear battle area' and the distance that must be covered by combat service support units to replenish combat units with vital fuel, water, ammunition and rations. The rear battle area extends from behind the advancing combat forces to the ports and airfields in Kuwait through which reinforcements and every manner of supplies enter the theatre of operations.
Posted by:Steve

#4  Saddam is employing a classic strategy, trying to set up strong defenses where he anticipates the main attacks will come. He is not in position to manuever.

This sets up some interesting possibilities, because he cannot defend every possible point of entry. He has neither the communications nor the mobility to do so. That can be exploited.

Gee, I wonder what the 101st has planned? Notice how they've sort of quietly disappeared from the radar?


Posted by: R. McLeod   2003-03-26 01:13:54  

#3  Let's not be forgetting that the Iraqis have learned lessons from GW1 as well. They know being bunched up in static positions in the open means death from above. Dispersal and using civilian structures (and civilians themselves) as shields are among their best options now.
Posted by: Dar Steckelberg   2003-03-25 13:12:24  

#2  "Where's the part about pounding them to flinders with B52s? I thought that was supposed to come before the helis?"

Actually, I think the new strategy is to have the helis "freeze" the tanks in place, THEN blow them to smithereens with precision guided munitions from B-52's. Kinda hard to spot tanks from 45,000 feet.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2003-03-25 12:54:56  

#1  There was a report on Fox earlier today that said that the RG tanks were widely dispursed, not in any sort of formation. I'd guess that's why no B-52 strike. During Rummy's Pentagon briefing just now they had video of a F-15 taking out a dug-in RG tank with a 500 pounder right down the hatch. Looks like we're going to have to hit them one by one.
Posted by: Steve   2003-03-25 12:53:47  

00:00