You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Baghdad: Highway to skyway
2003-04-02
Not far from Baghdad, the Marines transformed one of Saddam's modern highways into a runway for massive C-130 cargo planes that have already started landing there. And they did it all in 24 hours. The newly created 3,500-foot landing strip in the midst of marshy terrain is perfect for delivering fresh ammo, fuel, food and even Rice Krispies Treats to U.S. forces pushing north to the capital. "This is really going to accelerate our tempo," predicted Lt. Col. John Broadmeadow of the 1st Division. "This gives a lot more flexibility to bring the war forward."

The makeshift airstrip was built to handle the C-130 — which has proven to be the best way to move large quantities of supplies a long distance in a short time. Trucks have been breaking down in the sand and on Iraq's substandard roads, and helicopters can carry only a limited amount of supplies. To create the strip, the Marines had to "shave" the highway of all obstructions. That meant clearing away everything from 3-feet-high median dividers to towering 30-foot lamp posts, said Col. John Pomfret, commander of Combat Support Services Group 11, which oversaw the project. Early yesterday morning, a special military bulldozer set to work ripping up the lampposts, small trees and essentially smoothing out everything else standing more than an inch off the ground. Once the highway was as smooth as the head of a Marine recruit, the ground crew went to work placing pink neon markers along the center line and hooking up pumps and inflatable fuel pods. With the first C-130 scheduled to land, Cobra helicopter gunships circled the area barely 50 feet off the ground, on the prowl for any Iraqis intent on blowing up the fuel-laden plane with a shoulder-fired rocket. Other troops patrolled the area on high alert, aware of the risks involved in bringing such a plane deep into a battle zone where firefights are common.

Then, late yesterday afternoon, pilot Mark Graham, who had taken off from a base in Kuwait in his C-130, touched down with a load of fuel. He flew one low pass over the runway before circling back and making a perfect landing. After about 25 minutes, the 8,000 gallons of fuel were pumped out and he prepared for takeoff. Graham, whose radio call sign is "Cracker," said he'd never done a landing quite like it, but called it "a piece of cake." "Coming in was strange, but after that it was just like any other landing," said Graham, a reservist attached to Marine Aerial Refueler/Transport Squadron 452 in upstate Newburgh.
Now, what was that about supply problems?
Posted by:Steve

#5  There is one thing that has had me wondering the past few days. If the call is going out for Jihad and Allah is on their side( and I don't think that God is really on anybodies side )WHY ARE ALL OF THESE FREAKING COUNTRIES SUCH GO****N CRAPHOLES. For nations blessed with an aboundance of natural resources they sure have made a mess of themselves. Even though they played their political card for home consumption I say we let Mexico administer Iraq.
Posted by: Someone who did NOT vote for William Proxmire   2003-04-02 23:01:39  

#4  A fully loaded C-130 can take off in 2800 feet at sea level, 4500 feet at 6000 feet above sea level. Landing is between 3000 and 3500 feet.

Really don't need to land the bird, if you use a Low Altitude Parachute Extraction System drop, just come over some smooth, empty ground at 220Kt, open the back tailgate, and pop the lead chute. The six pallets get jerked off, one at a time, and slide forward to a stop. Not very good for fragile material, but anything rugged is no problem.

We had some De Haviland C-7 Caribou in Vietnam that could take off fully loaded (not a lot, but it pulled my young a$$ out) in less than 1700 feet.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2003-04-02 18:54:16  

#3  Your're coming in heavy and going out light, so 3500 ft is OK with a load and reversing the props for braking. It isn't FAA approved (they want 5000 ft) but this is wartime. We did alot of mine development support in NW alaska using these birds. Our motto was, Herc it--don't jerk it! Hats off to all the team!
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2003-04-02 15:15:19  

#2  You only need a 7,000 foot runway for attack and fighter jets. We had a long runway in Nam Phong, Thailand (Marine Air Group 15) in '72-73. One day the air traffic controllers, who worked out of tents about halfway down the runway, kept an Air Force C-5 waiting for 15 minutes before authorizing takeoff. In retaliation, the C-5 stayed on the runway until near the air traffic control tents, and then lifted off, with the resulting air blowing all the tents down. One lesson learned from this is that our transport planes, including big ones like the C-5, don't need a lot of runway.
Posted by: Anonymous   2003-04-02 14:11:57  

#1  I am amazed, only a 3500 ft runway! Damned, have we gots us some capabilities.
Posted by: Craig   2003-04-02 13:02:07  

00:00