You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
East/Subsaharan Africa
SA refuses to banish Iraqi officials
2003-04-02
Edited for length
The South African government has rejected a request from the United States to close Iraqi missions and to expel senior officials in this country. Speaking to journalists at Parliament after Cabinet's fortnightly meeting, government representative Joel Netshitenzhe said South Africa's actions would be guided by decisions taken by the United Nations. "And because there has not been any such decision by the United Nations, we do not see any reason to break our diplomatic relations with the state of Iraq. A formal response to this effect will be communicated as soon as possible to the US administration."
Hey, no skin off my fore. Just as long as we know which side you're on...
The US approach was based on the premise that the Iraqi government was both illegal and illegitimate, and needed to be overthrown. "On that account, they believe that other countries should not have relations with them (Iraq). But, as I have indicated, we will be guided on this by positions of the United Nations, and, most critically, Iraq remains a member of the United Nations, and the issue of the legality of the Iraqi state has not arisen there," he said. South Africa is one of more than 60 countries petitioned by the US government to shut Iraqi missions, pending the outcome of the US and British-led war in that country. Netshitenzhe said the vast majority of those countries had taken the same position as South Africa.
Posted by:Anonymous

#4  Guantanamo awaits.
Posted by: tu3031   2003-04-02 21:46:50  

#3  good question, especially if Iraq Interim Authority doesnt take power for several months. In afghan only 3 countries recognized the Taliban, and all backed off shortly after war began. What will happen after Iraqi govt collapses in Baghdad and can no longer claim to be de facto govt?? Expect much grinding of teeth among the various weasels.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2003-04-02 15:24:51  

#2  Not for long they don't.

Honestly, what are these governments going to do with all these diplomats and embassy's once Saddam's government has fallen, set them up as the legitimate government-in-exile of Iraq? That'd be a laugh riot...
Posted by: FOTSGreg   2003-04-02 15:04:58  

#1  "We want to keep our Iraqui idiots diplomats. They amuse us have the right to keep their asses out of the line of fire maintain an embassy here."
Posted by: Tadderly   2003-04-02 11:58:37  

00:00