You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Iraq
Blix: U.N. Experts Should Return to Iraq
2003-04-22
Won't this guy ever take 'no' for an answer?
Chief weapons inspector Hans Blix says U.N. inspectors should return to Iraq to independently verify the discovery of any weapons of mass destruction. The United States, however, said it sees no immediate reason role for his teams to exist. Russia has called for U.N. inspectors to complete their searches and certify that Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons have been eliminated along with the long-range missiles to deliver them. On Tuesday, Blix was to brief the council on the U.N. inspectors' readiness to resume work. But the opposing U.S. and Russian views indicate the difficulties ahead as the council faces divisive issues on post-war Iraq. These include not only Iraq's disarmament but the future of U.N. sanctions imposed after the country's 1990 invasion of Kuwait, the U.N. role in Iraq now that the fighting is over, control of Iraq's oil revenue, and lucrative reconstruction contracts.

Last week President Bush called for sanctions to be lifted quickly, so Iraq's oil revenue can be used to finance reconstruction. But under now obsolete council resolutions, U.N. inspectors must first certify that Iraq has no weapons of mass destruction. The Bush administration, which accused Blix of hindering truth and objectivity its drive for international support for the war, has already sent its own teams to Iraq to search for illegal weapons. ``We see no immediate role for Dr. Blix and his inspection teams,'' Richard Grenell, spokesman for U.S. Ambassador John Negroponte, said Monday. But Blix told The Associated Press that the United States should let U.N. inspectors return to certify their work. ``I think it might be wise for them to get independent verification because it has high credibility,'' he said when asked about the reported discovery by U.S. teams of ingredients and equipment in Iraq that could be used to make a chemical weapon.
Playing the canard that the US can't be trusted if we find something. Just another reason why Blix can't be allowed back into Iraq.
Secretary-General Kofi Annan ordered all U.N. international staff, including the inspectors, to leave Iraq just before the U.S.-led war began on March 19. He has said he expects them to return. Russia's deputy U.N. ambassador, Gennady Gatilov, said there is a need ``for an objective international organ to certify the situation.'' ``In what form it can be done - that can be discussed,'' he told The Associated Press. Before the war, Blix and chief nuclear inspector Mohamed ElBaradei said they might need several more months to determine whether Iraq was disarmed. ``Now, when there is no regime of Saddam Hussein, it might be much easier to do this job,'' Gatilov said.
And Mr. Gatilov, why is Saddam not there any more? You may now say "thank you, United States."
One council diplomat, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the aim of Tuesday's closed session with Blix was to try to connect what is happening on the ground with U.N. inspections. It isn't clear how sanctions could be eliminated if U.N. inspectors can't return.
Simple: all in favor say 'aye.'
Posted by:Steve White

#6  Blix has already proven he's not really interested in finding Iraq's WMD. Remember his tirade about Global Warming??? His dumpy little Swedish rear needs to be sent back to Stockholm in a can - preferably one that held Sarin precursors. The Iraqi situation at this point should not be subjected to anything from the UN.

Simple way to keep it from happening: Don't declare the "war" "over". Say it's unsafe for UN inspectors to nose into anything. Cite the Fedayeen Saddam or the international bounty-hunters from the rest of the Arab world as the reason. Then let the Coalition go ahead and do what needs to be done. Once everything's done, a new government in Iraq, and stability in the region, tell the UN there's no reason for them to poke their noses into the affairs of a sovereign state. We'll have four or five years of gripes from UN members, but it will preclude 50 years (or more) of "refugees" - IE, the Paleostinians.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2003-04-22 13:28:36  

#5  I'll side with Fred. Didn't Blix say that Iraq probably doesn't have WMD and all the US evidence was made up? Let him in and poke his nose in the first barrel with sarin the US inspectors find.
Posted by: True German Ally   2003-04-22 13:18:34  

#4  I've got to say that I'm in favor of allowing Blixie and his team back in, to inspect and verify to their teeny-tiny little hearts' content. The more the merrier. If the U.S. teams are finding stuff, and the UN team's not, then the UN team looks stoopid and obstructionist. If the UN team finds stuff, then it demonstrates that the Iraqis were obstructing them and the Blixicrats were pretending they weren't.

If nobody finds anything, then all of them are looking in the wrong places.
Posted by: Fred   2003-04-22 10:00:08  

#3  'Ere now, wot's all this then?

Go away Blixie, there's a good little froggy.
Posted by: Colonel Crumpet   2003-04-22 09:48:59  

#2  Russia's deputy U.N. ambassador, Gennady Gatilov, said there is a need ``for an objective international organ to certify the situation.'' ``In what form it can be done - that can be discussed,''

::snicker:: He said "organ".

We can be sure they'll be bending the U.S. and U.K. over before using said organ.
Posted by: Samma-lamma   2003-04-22 08:39:14  

#1  I find it just disgusting that those hypocrites at the UN have not immediately lifted sanctions on Saddam being ousted: and worse, that the Left has not condemned them for it.

Remember, these are the "crippling sanctions" responsible for the deaths of "500,000 Iraqi Children" TM, that the socialists blamed the USA entirely for.

So now the UN is continuing the sanctions with NO reason... I hear the sound of crickets chirping on the Left coast of Australia/USA/Britain
Posted by: anon1   2003-04-22 07:46:16  

00:00