You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
The costs of war
2003-05-21
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has ordered the U.S. military to collaborate on a "lessons learned" study of the Iraq war. That will take months, but the air commander, Lt. Gen. Michael Moseley, has had a team from his "analysis and assessments" staff compile some raw numbers. Some highlights of the 16-page report:
  • 423,998 U.S. MILITARY personnel were deployed;
  • other Coalition forces sent an additional 42,987 troops.
  • The total is roughly equivalent to the
    population of Albuquerque, N.M.
  • The war lasted 720 hours.
  • The allies
    flew more than 41,400 sorties.
  • That consumed 18,622 tons of fuel, enough
    to keep a Boeing 737-300 airliner aloft for about 12 years.
  • The Coalition flew 1,801 aircraft-all but 138 were American.
  • The Iraqis were showered with 31,800,000 leaflets bearing 81 different Messages. End to end, the leaflets would have made 120,454 rolls of toilet paper.
  • Coalition forces lost 20 aircraft, but only 7 as a result of enemy fire.
  • Search-and-rescue teams flew 55 missions and saved 73 people.
  • 80 aircraft were flown to gather intelligence; they took 42,000 pictures of the battlefield, transmitted 3,200 hours of video and eavesdropped on 2,400 hours of Iraqi communications.
  • Known costs: $917,744,361.55 - an amount equivalent to 46 minutes, 10.5 seconds' worth of total U.S. economic output in 2001.
In other words, we liberated Iraq with less than an hour's worth of economic effort. Doesn't this redefine the word "superpower"?
Posted by:Chuck

#5  OP. Some were helos. And some were B-52's flying from England and DG. Just for grins and giggles I looked up some typical loadings: F18C 4,926 Kg internal fuel. F18E 6,531 Kg.

At those numbers even if tactical fighters were only 10% of missions flown that would account for ALL the fuel documented in the MSNBC report. 1000 LBs per mission (440 Kg) still looks a little low for an overall average.
Posted by: Dave   2003-05-22 02:38:19  

#4  The war's not over, not by a long shot. The shooting has died down a bit. This estimate is premature.
Posted by: Tresho   2003-05-22 02:32:11  

#3  Dave, of those 41,400 sorties, there's a good probability that more than half of those were rotary-wing aircraft. They don't guzzle fuel quite like a fast-mover.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2003-05-22 00:55:48  

#2  "Known costs: $917,744,361.55 " - Less than a billion dollars! Most estimates are in the 50 to 100 billion range.
Posted by: Phil B   2003-05-21 21:52:42  

#1  "The allies flew more than 41,400 sorties. That consumed 18,622 tons of fuel,"
Less than 1000 lbs of fuel (about 150 Gallons) per sortie? That can't be right.

I'll bet MSNBC mangled this number and that 18,622 tons of fuel is only what was actually delivered by aerial tanker during air to air refueling missions.
Posted by: Dave   2003-05-21 20:25:39  

00:00