You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front
Islamic expert: Take off veil
2003-05-29
Before and After
Before and After, courtesy The Smoking Gun
Not looking good for Sultaana...
A Muslim woman who refuses to unveil for a drivers license picture should do so to further the state's interest in public safety, an Islamic law expert testified at her civil trial Wednesday. Khaled Abou El Fadl, a law professor at the University of California-Los Angeles who specializes in Islam, the Middle East and human rights, said he believes Sultaana Freeman could uncover her face for a drivers license photograph because it serves a specific, limited purpose.
So the state of Florida has to fly this guy in from UCLA to testify in this rinky dink trial that shouldn't even be in court? How much did that cost? When she loses, either send her or the ACLU the bill.
If she's gonna have a veil over her face, why bother to take the picture? It won't show anything. Might as well just borrow one from somebody else...
El Fadl, who discussed Shariah, or Islamic law and Middle Eastern customs, said there are times when veiled Muslim women uncover their faces and bodies out of necessity. Exceptions include aging women and marriage seekers and for medical reasons, voter registration, test taking, writing wills and burial. "Accordingly, she would clearly be able to show her face" for a drivers license, El Fadl said.
Maybe Sultaana's like, really, really UGLY! Anybody think that might be a possibility?
Maybe she just decided to quit shaving. Maybe she's not, ummm... female? How do we know she's not a cross-dresser with a moustache?
Howard Marks, Freeman's attorney, sought to disqualify El Fadl as a witness and had sharp exchanges with him because he said El Fadl does not know Freeman and cannot address her deeply held conviction that she wear a veil at all times. "I don't know what motivates her," El Fadl said under oath.
Maybe she's one of those "look at me" people like Pledge of Allegiance guy last year. Who's to say. But it got me a nice Florida vacation for a couple of days.
Shariah doesn't take into account anybody's "deeply held convictions." If it's in the book or the hadith, you do it, otherwise they cut something off.
El Fadl was one of three state witnesses who testified during the second day of Freeman's non-jury trial, which ends today in Orlando. Circuit Court Judge Janet Thorpe must decide whether law-enforcement issues outweigh personal silliness civil liberties in a contested case that is being televised nationwide on CourtTV.
Hey, Sultaana! You're on CourtTV! Next come the talk shows!
Under cross-examination, El Fadl said there are minority groups within Islam's two prominent sects — the Sunni and Shiites — that wear veils because of their interpretation of Islam. On Wednesday, Freeman said she is a member of the Salafiyyah group. "In the long run, his testimony supports our position that Sultaana Freeman is exercising her right to freely exercise her religion," Marks said. "I still don't think he's relevant. I wish he was, but I don't think he hurt us at all."
So why'd you try to get his testimony tossed? ACLU guy knows he's dead. But he's on CourtTV! Next come the talk shows!
Maybe even a book deal. "Gaming the System: How I burned Florida taxpayer dollars and got to be on the teevee"...
El Fadl's testimony contradicts that of Saiful-Islam Abdul-Ahad, a U.S. Muslim convert and University of Central Florida academic adviser who testified on Freeman's behalf Tuesday. Abdul-Ahad, 54, a friend of Freeman's husband, said Freeman's interpretation of the Quran justifies her wearing a veil at all times except when facing death or danger.
This is the best they got? A buddy of her husbands is an Islamic expert? Fly me down. I'll testify for her. I could use a couple of days in Florida.
El Fadl has testified as an expert witness on behalf of Muslim-American women fighting for their right to wear a hijab, or head covering, at work. However, on Wednesday he said Freeman's insistence on wearing a veil was "rare."
"Yep. Even in Islam, we rarely see that particulary combination of vanity and dim-bulbery...
"I've never seen someone decide to wear the niqab [full-face veil] the way she claims she should," said the Kuwaiti-born naturalized U.S. citizen, who has addressed Muslim women's issues extensively in academic journals and as an imam, or religious leader, for the past 20 years in the United States.
Yeah, but her guy's an academic advisor at UCF. So, there!
Marks loudly protested El Fadl's description of Muslim customs in Saudi Arabia and other Muslim countries. "We do have a constitution here. We do have a Bill of Rights and a Florida Constitution with a Religious Freedom Restoration Act," Marks told Thorpe.
I love it when ACLU lawyers, like, totally panic!
Jason Vail, one of two lawyers from the Attorney General's Office representing the state, later praised El Fadl and called his 16-page curriculum vitae "impressive." "What Islamic law is all about as it relates to veiling, we've only scratched the surface," Vail said outside the courtroom. "The relationship of Islamic law to Islamic practice is a very complicated issue."
"This trial could last years, burning dollars every day..."
El Fadl's testimony followed that of Sandra Lambert, who oversees the highway safety agency's drivers license division. Lambert admitted that internal agency policies — not state statutes — sometimes specify requirements for obtaining a drivers license. Marks has argued that the law is vague and does not require someone to uncover their face for a photograph or prohibit people from using mustaches, beards or wigs.
Or maybe they could just substitute a photo of a can of pineapple. Who'd know?
"Santa Claus could come in and have a photo taken, right?" Marks remarked with sarcasm.
If she wins, he'll be by for his picture. Along with the Easter Bunny and Groucho and whoever else wants to come...
Lambert replied: "We don't allow costumes." To which Marks asked, "Where's that in the statutes? You don't know what's policy, and you're making this up as you go along," Marks said.
If it's not written down, it's meat on the table for an ACLU lawyer. Unless it's a gun control law. Point: ACLU.
"I stand by might right to wear a cape and a funny hat to have my driver's license picture taken! We have a constitution in this country, and I have a right to look like an idiot! Right this moment, I'm wearing ladies' underwear, and you can do nothing, nothing about it!"
Florida Highway Patrol Lt. Col. Billy Dickson, a 39-year veteran who has worked with Lambert on a new digital drivers license database for law-enforcement agencies, argued that security concerns mandate full-face photographs that are "essential" for identification purposes."The drivers license must and should contain a photograph that gives a true representation of the person who holds that license," Dickson testified.
Otherwise "this space intentionally left blank" on the license would do...
According to state records, one other Florida Muslim woman was issued a state photo ID card with a veil in 2001. Like Freeman, former Jacksonville resident Mattie Glover was asked to return to a drivers license office for a new picture in 2001. She never went back, and the state also canceled her ID card.
But they can't go pick it up from her, because nobody knows what she looks like, do they?
I'm sure she's glued to Court TV.
Posted by:tu3031

#20  Do you think she swore on the Bible to tell the truth before testifying???
Posted by: Yosemite Sam   2003-05-29 16:34:27  

#19  I think that she is partially right. She should be allowed to have her picture taken with the burkah and she should not be allowed to have a driver's license. Solomon would have liked it.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2003-05-29 16:33:58  

#18  Whoa! Airbrush? Try sandblaster.
And Fed UP? Take deep breaths. She ain't gonna win.
Posted by: tu3031   2003-05-29 15:34:11  

#17  More info: Apparently Florida bit it's own leg with a feel-good "religous freedom restoration act"

http://www.google.com/search?q=Florida+state+Religious+Freedom+Restoration+Act
Posted by: mojo   2003-05-29 15:26:58  

#16  I told you so! I knew this wench had some sorrid past. She is just trying to get her 30 seconds of fame. Prediction: Within 12 months she will be in a Playboy/Penthouse/Swank photo shoot. It will be called 'Wow! Look behind the veil!' Get that air brush ready this is going to needs some work.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2003-05-29 14:57:00  

#15  this is such a load of crap! if you imigrate to another country you follow that countries laws - period!
Posted by: Dan   2003-05-29 14:46:23  

#14  I agree with Hiryu...she is a black woman, previously with a hyphenated name--isnt that so cute---with previous criminal charges, probably on welfare, has 6 kids, not married legally, no education, a very recent convert to Islam, looking for a way to make a buck off the system...anyone know if this judge is by any chance a black woman too? If so...watch this story...it aint over by a long shot...she has an excellent chance of winning this....another example of the bullshit the Muslims and the blacks--oh, arent they the same?--are using to subvert the system. I'm glad I'm almost dead, dont want to be around when the Black Muslims do take over..
Posted by: Fed UP   2003-05-29 14:46:09  

#13  Now it turns out the husband has got a record. What a couple!
Posted by: Michael   2003-05-29 14:32:01  

#12  Katz: Thank you for that piece of news. If you link to the story and look at the photos on the side bars, you will see a blow up of her mug shot in the hands of a ADA. I wondered what it was all about. Again, thanks Katz because her criminal record raises all sorts of interesting psychological questions about her conversion.
Hiryu: She looks white to me, but her husband is black. Is he Nation of Islam or something less radical, like a follower of Wahibism? I hope for our sakes, it's something mild like Wahibism.

Hate to generalize, but the black American converts I met over the years, especially in Saudi, really value the power that the Koran and Hadith (their interpretations, not mine) give them over women. I can see this fragile white woman under this guy's spell and his telling her she has to get back at The Man for him through her being discriminated against. I'd like to be a fly on the wall for her therapy sessions.
BTW, the Muslim expert, al-Fadl, is despised by the Wahibites the world over. Too liberal, it appears.
Posted by: Michael   2003-05-29 13:29:57  

#11  True German Ally: Good point, that where she would have to stay veiled she'd also have to eschew the driver's spot.
Posted by: Korora   2003-05-29 13:10:41  

#10  "Me thinks this is probably a black gal seeking to get back at The Man."

Think again.
Posted by: Anonymous   2003-05-29 13:00:12  

#9  Well, that answers a few questions I had. Careful what you wish for, Sultaana. Because people will get up your ass with a microscope these days if you put yourself in the position.
Posted by: tu3031   2003-05-29 11:26:03  

#8  Well, she has a child battery charge in her past.
Posted by: Katz   2003-05-29 10:42:03  

#7  The judge is a woman.
Posted by: tu3031   2003-05-29 10:22:44  

#6  Me thinks this is probably a black gal seeking to get back at The Man. Yawn.
Posted by: Hiryu   2003-05-29 10:21:26  

#5  Why is this nonsense taking up more than about 30 seconds of court time? Do they castrate their judges in Florida when they're elected/appointed?
Posted by: mojo   2003-05-29 10:14:27  

#4  Maybe someone could remind her that Islamic women must not drive at all. At least not in Saudi Arabia. Forgot how many lashes though...
Posted by: True German Ally   2003-05-29 09:55:50  

#3  This is all a bunch of crap, and a waste of taxpayer money. If she insists on keeping the veil, then she gets no driver's license. End of story. (maybe afterwards her wages can be garnished to recover the costs of this fiasco, assuming she works)
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2003-05-29 09:46:26  

#2  Maybe someone should look into Howard Marks, the ACLU attorney and see where he has been and what he has been doing. It would be interesting to see what kind of cases he has been handling and who he as been hanging out with.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2003-05-29 20:02:11  

#1  While this really is a tempest in a teacup the veil do wonders for looks
Posted by: Someone who did NOT vote for William Proxmire   2003-05-29 17:17:50  

00:00