You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Iraq: Letter from SF soldier
2003-07-21
Hat tip: Winds of Change. Edited for brevity.
Hey Guys, sorry it’s been so long since I’ve sent anything but a quick note to you individually. However things have been pretty hectic since the end of hostilities and the start of the real war. Despite what the assholes in the press like to say over and over:

1. We did expect some armed resistance from the Ba’ath Party and Feydaheen;
2. It isn’t any worse than expected;
3. Things are getting better each day, and
4. The morale of the troops is A-1, except for the normal bitching and griping.

My brief love affair with the press, especially the guys who had the cajones to be embedded with the troops during the fighting, is probably over, especially since we are back being criticized by the same Roland Headly types that used to hang around the Palestine Hotel drinking Baghdad Bob’s whiskey and parroting his ridiculous B.S.
...
I’m no longer baby-sitting the pukes from CNN and the canned hams from the networks, but have a combat mission coordinating a bunch of A teams, seeking, finding and rooting out the mostly non-Iraqis that are well-armed, well-paid (in U.S. dollars) and always waiting to wail for the press and then shoot some GI in the back in the midst of a crowd.

The only reason the GIs are pissed (not demoralized) is that they cannot touch, must less waste, those taunting bags of gas that scream in their faces and riot on cue when they spot a camera man from ABC, BBC, CBS, CNN or NBC. If they did, then they know the next nightly news will be about how chaotic things are and how much the Iraqi people hate us.

Some do. But the vast majority don’t and more and more see that the GIs don’t start anything, are by-and-large friendly, and very compassionate, especially to kids and old people. I saw a bunch of 19 year-olds [deleted] not return fire coming from a mosque until they got a group of elderly civilians out of harm’s way. So did the Iraqis.

A bunch of bad guys used a group of women and children as human shields. The GIs surrounded them and negotiated their surrender fifteen hours later and when they discovered a three year-old girl had been injured by the big tough guys throwing her down a flight of stairs, the GIs called in a MedVac helicopter to take her and her mother to the nearest field hospital. The Iraqis watched it all, and there hasn’t been a problem in that neighborhood since. How many such stories, and there are hundreds of them, ever get reported in the fair and balanced press? You know, nada.
...
The place is still a mess but most of it has been for years. But the Hospitals are open and are in the process of being brought into the 21st Century. The MOs and visiting surgeons from home are teaching their docs new techniques and One American pharmaceutical company (you know, the kind that all the hippies like to scream about as greedy) donated enough medicine to stock 45 hospital pharmacies for a year.

Safe water is more available. Electricity has been restored to pre-war levels but saboteurs keep cutting the lines. And The old Ba’ath big shots are upset because they can’t get fuel for their private generators. One actually complained to General McKeirnan, who told him it was a rough world.
...
Our search and destroy missions are largely at night, free of reporters and generally terrifying to those brave warriors of Allah.

The only thing that frightens them more is hearing the word "Gitmo". The word is out that a trip to Guantanimo Bay is not a Caribbean vacation and they usually start squealing like the little mice they are, when an interrogator mentions "Gitmo".
...
As the movie quoted old General Patton, "God help me, I love it." I do. Nothing more satisfying than working with the BEST damn soldiers in the world, flushing real human poop down the drain and giving some folks a chance at trying freedom for a change.

They may learn to like it and then my great-great-grandson won’t have to worry about some maniac trying to destroy the planet.
...
P.S. A couple of you asked me about Curly and his two sons, Dumb and Dumber. I still think we got him and one son, but the slugs may have gotten away. If they are alive, I can’t believe they are hanging around here. Even Curly isn’t that stupid ... then again. He might be in Syria or Lebanon. If he is, he’s too moronic to keep quiet, then we’ll get him. I promise.
Go read it all!
Posted by:Dar

#9  Hi Dar. Thanks for the referral.
Posted by: Joe Katzman   2003-7-21 8:47:21 PM  

#8  I would really and trully give my left testacle to lead this bunch of kids in combat....not taking anything away from the draftees I led in Viet Nam but this generation of soldier is better trained, better motivated and more professional than anything I had at my disposal....
They are a great bunch of kids and true heroes, everyday they do more for our country than all of the scotch sipping media nebishes in New York.
I tip my hat to these young men, we should be danged proud of them and they are proof positive that given half a chance, maybe the next generation will undo the damage the SDS and closet Weathermen are now doing to our society.
Posted by: SOG475   2003-7-21 8:15:32 PM  

#7  Aye thank you!
Posted by: Ptah   2003-7-21 7:55:59 PM  

#6  Great letter - gives the feel as well as the fact.

And written by a man who is thinking - not the incessant griping of weenies - that 11A5S describes so well. (I never got a cat-house TDY, shit!) This guy is aware - self, situationally, and the big picture. A Class Act.

Michael - You should be worried about their gullibility, not their morale. Those stupid schmoes told the reporter what he wanted to hear because they're just fucking kids foolishly "impressed" with the asshat who was fulfilling the assigned editorial agenda: Get me a story on bitching GI's. Reduced from soldiers to the lowest point in civilization: tools of the agenda trade.

I no longer subscribe to newspapers and, for the most part, don't read their sites except by linkage from a blog or story on NRO, TCS, etc. I am not alone, of course, and the "fall" of the establishment news organizations is far from over.
Posted by: PD   2003-7-21 7:46:38 PM  

#5  Michael: Unless you've been there, you have no idea what a culture of complaint exists in the Army. (I can't vouch for the other services.) I recently completed a reserve tour in support of Operation Noble Eagle. I had absolutely forgotten what it was like. There is nothing that compares with it in the private sector. And don't think its just the privates. If you want to find out what mid-career officers and NCOs bitch about, go read Hackworth's site. And do you think that Barry McCafferty just came up with his complaints on his own? Ha! His general officer buddies call him and say, "I can't go public on this, but if you don't take this to the press, the mission is in danger!" And Barry goes on Meet the Press

I could go into a unit that had just had an all-expenses paid trip to a cat house, followed by four weeks of leave, and I can guarantee you that I could find ten privates and a couple of E-5/E-6's who would bad mouth their commander, the US Army, the food, and the Pope. Griping is just not an indicator of unit morale.

The primary statistics to look at are AWOL, desertion, and reenlistment rates. I call these the active stats since they reflect being pissed off enough to take action. The passive stats are STDs, petty disciplne violations, and drug use. These are cop outs rather than f*** you's and are less tightly correlated with poor morale.

When should you be worried as a citizen and a tax payer? If the NYT prints an article saying that AWOL rates have doubled since the start of the war, don't be alarmed. Since the adoption of an all-volunteer force, AWOL rates have dropped to lows unheard of for any military in history. If an article says rates have increased 500-1000%, then you might get worried.
Posted by: 11A5S   2003-7-21 6:38:46 PM  

#4  On behalf of my planet, thanks, soldiers all.
Posted by: Ri'Neref   2003-7-21 6:13:55 PM  

#3  Drudge played many times last night the ABC report from last week in which the one Army guy said he would ask for Rumsfeld's resignation if Rummy were in the same room with the soldier. Others didn't care for Iraqis anymore, felt like they had been kicked in the gut since their departure has been set back a few times. Then I noticed the report was coming from guys in Fallujah. I guess if you're a GI in that place, then feeling depressed and unappreciated might be natural.
Eleanor Clift signed off on the McLaughlin show by stating how there would be a rising hue and cry from Americans on the mistake that Bush made to go into Iraq. The result? We will start withdrawing Americans in the face of the "quagmire". Her source? All the e-mails that the troops are sending home stating how much Iraq sucks and how it's a quagmire.
I remember Eleanor stating before the Nov mid-terms that once voters saw their 401K's reduced in value, they'd all vote to kick out the Repubs. from House and surely it all meant a larger majority for Dems in the senate. We know the result, so I'm not particularly worried re Iraq/troop morale if E Clift is harping on it.

But what about our guys? Are they really that bitter about staying in Iraq? I note the writer of the letter is Special Forces, not regular Army.
Does that make a difference? I was talking to my uncle over the weekend, and this guy was a Ranger, saw Morocco, somehow made it out of Anzio/Italian, southern France campaigns without being wounded. About 14 months of real heavy stuff. He understands the GI's feelings, but he says he had it alot worse than the guys do in Iraq. As a guy who's never served, I'm hesitant to start pointing fingers at guys whose lives are on the line, but who signed up nevertheless. How about it you vetrans? Are the stories of low morale something to be concerned about?
Posted by: Michael   2003-7-21 4:26:03 PM  

#2   Unless the Air Force attached their own SF to the teams for joint "training" they'll have to be forced. The head wing nuts really do believe that air power is the all powerful war winning weapon, even though it's been proven time and time again that it's not. (Quite the force multiplier, however, I must say.) (Us infantry guys love you Warthog and B-52 pilots!)

There's no "I" in "TEAM", but the delusional higher ups in the Air Force can only see the "m" and the "e".
Posted by: Paul   2003-7-21 3:50:35 PM  

#1  Add'l SF news from StrategyPage:
July 21, 2003: The U.S. Army Special Forces is trying to expand their A-Teams from 12 to 14 men. The two new positions would specialize in sniping and controlling air strikes. Both jobs require the use of long range sensors (day/night sights). But there’s a problem, in that the U.S. Air Force only wants its own personnel to call in air strikes. The air force also does not want to expand it’s air controller force to provide as many controllers as the Special Forces (and the rest of the Army) wants. The Special Operations Command will probably have to go right to the top (Secretary of Defense or President) to get the air force to loosen up on their air controller monopoly.
Posted by: Dar   2003-7-21 3:38:35 PM  

00:00