You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa: Southern
ZIMBABWE: WFP retains control of food distributions
2003-08-26
The Zimbabwean government has given an assurance that the World Food Programme (WFP) will remain in control of humanitarian food distribution, despite a controversial new policy directive issued by the government this month, UN Humanitarian Coordinator Victor Angelo told IRIN on Monday. "We were told that we can proceed as we did last year ... We will be implementing the [food distribution] programme this month with no operational change at the ground level. The UN will keep monitoring the situation on the ground," Angelo said.
Bob's regime must be getting weak of he can't even bully the UN anymore...
The ministry of public service, labour and social welfare had issued a new policy guideline altering the memorandum of understanding with WFP, which authorised the agency and its partners to distribute food aid in the country. The new directive allows WFP and its partners to deliver food to distribution points, but the government would then be responsible for the selection and physical distribution of the food to beneficiaries through local government structures and village authorities. NGOs would perform only a monitoring role.
Oh. Maybe not then. For a moment there, I thought the WFP was actually standing its ground instead of saving face...
The directive, the "Policy on Operations of Non-Governmental Organisations in Humanitarian and Developmental Assistance in Zimbabwe", has been condemned as opening the door to the politicisation of WFP-delivered food. "In Zimbabwe the only real currency at the moment is food. The implications of this directive are extremely worrying, as it gives the government free rein over who receives food and who does not. The country really does not need this at this juncture, especially since it is the NGOs who are keeping the most vulnerable communities afloat," spokesman for the opposition Movement for Democratic Change party, Paul Themba Nyathi, told IRIN.
ZANU/PF, on the other hand, thinks starving the uncooperative is just a dandy idea...
He also alleged that Western donors would be unlikely to fund Zimbabwe's food aid appeal if the selection of beneficiaries and distribution was under the control of the government. An estimated 5.5 million Zimbabweans will be in need of food aid by January 2004.
But now the WFP has things obfuscated enough that everybody can kick in and pretend the groceries are actually going to go to the populace...
Explaining the government's position, public service minister July Moyo was quoted as saying: "We appealed for the food aid and we should determine how it is distributed."
"If we want to starve certain segments of our population, that's our business. Just kick in the groceries and shut up..."
On Wednesday last week, Angelo and WFP country representative Kevin Farrell met with Moyo "to ask for clarification" on the new policy. Angelo said he was assured that the government's policy guidelines "do not mean that we as the UN will change the way we operate", adding that if there was any political interference by the authorities, the incident would be reported to the government.
And then they'd be in large trouble, by gum!
Posted by:Fred Pruitt

#1  Sadaam increased his level of control in Iraq during the 10 years he directly controlled food distribution. He also seemed adept at the identifying extra funds he needed for redecorating projects around the country. Although his catering gig seemed pretty lucrative, I, personally, would have farmed the operation out to Subway. They’re pro’s and do an excellent job with large orders. One six-foot BMT per day ought to take care of the needs of an average village.
Posted by: Steve D   2003-8-26 2:55:52 PM  

00:00